From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recursive load case in openp Date: 12 Apr 2002 11:35:37 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5x8z7ti7iu.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200204102343.IAA06716@etlken.m17n.org> <200204111301.g3BD1VI30043@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200204120313.g3C3D4v22341@aztec.santafe.edu> <200204120403.g3C43WR07781@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018600686 1873 127.0.0.1 (12 Apr 2002 08:38:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16vwZK-0000U6-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:38:06 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16vwpV-0001lV-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:54:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16vwXT-0002Qr-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16vwW7-0002LQ-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:34:47 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 24DD17C047 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:34:46 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200204120403.g3C43WR07781@rum.cs.yale.edu> Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2570 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2570 "Stefan Monnier" writes: > > Of course, in the mean time we should just create > > temp_buffer_setup and have temp_output_buffer_setup call it. > > The actual code needed in coding.c was too small to be worth > > such a subroutine. I will fix fileio.c also. > > I disagree with your assessment of the various costs involved. > I find the cost of maintaining such duplicated code much > higher than the potential CPU and memory cost of a few spills. I agree 100%. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk