From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lwlib-Xol* files and make-dist? Date: 22 Apr 2002 18:07:45 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5x662jk97y.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200204220747.g3M7lDZ01914@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019488173 703 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2002 15:09:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Pavel@Janik.cz, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zfRd-0000BE-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:09:33 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16zfSN-0007cz-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:10:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zfRR-0006OH-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zfPE-0006IO-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id CF3677C048; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:06:57 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200204220747.g3M7lDZ01914@aztec.santafe.edu> Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3039 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3039 Richard Stallman writes: > so files lwlib/lwlib-Xol* never end up in dist file. Is there any reason > to have them in CVS when they are not distributed? > > I see no point in throwing the code away. Doing cvs remove on a file does not throw any code away (it's still in the repository); it's just not checked out with the head - thus no longer giving the impression that the code is still used. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk