From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX Date: 11 Jul 2002 15:27:33 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5x3cuqqtru.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200207091852.g69IqA713949@aztec.santafe.edu> <20020710104625.D772.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026390390 30210 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2002 12:26:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sd1i-0007r9-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:26:30 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17SdB6-0000pY-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:36:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sd2N-0004s9-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sd29-0004ra-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id F02837C017; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:26:55 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20020710104625.D772.LEKTU@terra.es> Original-Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5648 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5648 Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:52:10 -0600 (MDT), Richard Stallman wrote: > > > A better name would be SPECPDL_INDEX. > > > > Would someone please make that global replacement? > > Done. For consistency, I suggest to change all occurrences of `specpdl_ptr - specpdl' to SPECPDL_INDEX. Also the name of the variable where we store the value of SPECPDL_INDEX is typically named `count' which I find pretty confusing reading the code ... "count of what?". I'd suggest changing the name of those variables to `specpdl_index' or just `spix' (which isn't currently used anywhere) for short. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk