From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: How to restore the layout? Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 08:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5f8e3fb9-8dba-4cd2-ab31-9ae03fa8ec07@default> References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51CE9B05.1090202@gmx.at> <51CFFBED.7090400@gmx.at> <51D02AB0.5070103@gmx.at> <51D5DE14.4090507@alice.it> <51D600D8.90801@alice.it> <51D67985.7010806@gmx.at> <51D69AF8.2050606@alice.it> <51D6C2FA.7040708@gmx.at> <51D6CD1C.5050504@alice.it> <51D6DB49.7020005@gmx.at> <831u7czx1i.fsf@gnu.org> <51D72CC9.9040704@alice.it> <51D7D9B1.8080102@gmx.at> <51D7DF18.2010502@alice.it> <51D7F501.7020207@gmx.at> <51D7F9C1.4000801@alice.it> <51D81657.8020108@gmx.at> <972fd406-97dc-42fc-9727-03642e351c88@default> <51D949AD.6020800@gmx.at> <51D96326.9040500@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373212450 17110 80.91.229.3 (7 Jul 2013 15:54:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 15:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , Angelo Graziosi To: martin rudalics , Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 07 17:54:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UvrHr-000440-M0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 17:54:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39190 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvrHr-000372-BA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvrHo-00034i-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvrHm-0003ze-27 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:28831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvrHj-0003yd-Kk; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:53:59 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r67FrrJ5028722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 7 Jul 2013 15:53:54 GMT Original-Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r67Frq6s020246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Jul 2013 15:53:53 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt106.oracle.com (abhmt106.oracle.com [141.146.116.58]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r67FrqfW020243; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 15:53:52 GMT In-Reply-To: <51D96326.9040500@gmx.at> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.7 (607090) [OL 12.0.6668.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161706 Archived-At: > > I don't think it "drops" them, it just resizes and repositions the > > frame so they are outside the screen. >=20 > Judging from what GetWindowRect returns you're right. In this case the > lower border would disappear under the taskbar so the appearance relies > on the order in which windows are drawn. OTOH GetWindowRect could lie > to us by adding the border sizes to the bounding rectangle. We won't be > able to tell the difference. Interesting. I hadn't played with f11 before. FWIW (curiosity only, probably): Using my frame-movement commands I see something different: I can move the maximized frame around normally, and thus can see that the frame borders, including the title bar, have indeed been dropped (there are none). I can also resize the maximized frame (again, using frame-cmds.el commands) horizontally any amount. But I can shrink it vertically only one line, for some reason. I also did not realize that the same holds for a frame maximized by clicking the Windows maximize icon/button in the title bar: I can move it around and resize it. And in this case, unlike the case after maximizing with f11, there is no limit to shrinking vertically.