From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs master + org Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 07:21:47 +0000 Message-ID: <5f6988c78169688e326a@heytings.org> References: <83tu6v27yh.fsf@gnu.org> <6F871C02-AC26-4B89-B64B-E9F4ACACDBE7@acm.org> <83sfmf26b6.fsf@gnu.org> <835yja7o7j.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8ra5uee.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnbqcebn.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6416"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 03 09:23:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ8jF-0001XT-GT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 09:23:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57642 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ8jE-0002sZ-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 03:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ8hS-0000tk-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 03:21:51 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:34842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ8hR-0006uB-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 03:21:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1659511307; bh=AZhFIj5KNN0N3IihalDeEa8G6hzHDMX9wsvcofySZTo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=CMQNYDVEwCoFygllU+RhZb3JLwBM0XDjmbTWPyfm6VGdCH5pHhdlKrPbDJqvq7zGU /x4UbmjBlox1ywJQDOOaQ/SPflsLsGWNIlyGj0YZUumCw8rA/7asvHOI2oJ3a6ONwi FMBXNzo98BmvmL5i3ik/2SC/9p19rshV+cvOa8P/qwTfEMj79FbtG/CL++Ccebin8d dcEMWOOVDgj2d1YNFiD+M7yGk8/7vs+XZWYAcIMAbWaFPPsqXA5GSOjXz0PHw6Dasc 1DjUkAs+M6GL17aKFhicwS0TQg0+4qhi1Aeb8+H4xKrZ5o/f+kIAI+ofpyXspTrZXM KGGeex/7/B4eQ== In-Reply-To: <87wnbqcebn.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293005 Archived-At: > > Is there really a slowdown associated with allowing code to widen > outside the bounds specified by redisplay long-line "optimizations"? > Or are we speculating about a hypothetical problem that doesn't exist > again? > How kindly this is said! "Optimizations" between quotation marks, as if they weren't. Speculating. Hypothetical problem. That doesn't exist. Again. Thank you!