From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:20:03 +0100 Message-ID: <5f31adb8-f0ee-a253-0b3c-f60385c56699@gmx.at> References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <6c86c25b-22df-2b69-34fe-539605f624ba@yandex.ru> <7dd69fe5-4ef4-782c-2fba-031d475f6406@yandex.ru> <32fb4915-be55-f753-5f6c-423a09030fd6@gmx.at> <8b252ea4-5902-d21e-a0d7-cdb3ddbb4e08@yandex.ru> <39d47d8c.4bad.16fcd672191.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <729d39eb-d0b4-2cc5-cac3-e129a3effa87@yandex.ru> <06c6b6fb-ce6f-456b-6a22-c5a26a0ab297@gmx.at> <50912835-37d2-f15b-8fd1-b6619893d1ce@yandex.ru> <4a424bf3-ee08-b114-73ef-287bde14003b@gmx.at> <05459ded-2ee2-73b3-0c2b-62febcf0d356@gmx.at> <5686da19-24a4-0401-7a00-a41fab02b920@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="18939"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Dmitry Gutov , tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 28 17:23:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwTe2-0004tG-H0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:23:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwTe1-0002OR-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwTbI-00014C-BM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwTbH-0004Qi-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:20:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:50543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwTbH-0004QK-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:20:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1580228404; bh=2hxL79WEDXgwMFEYxHrjDSYcnYRhrfJFNqFTDETB1EQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=VXq6svDBbg6WhqZ2reaPnoEWRkMgJ4IWtQhcbp4gF1VvXWYSvTHOJH096g7GHpiEj COoVZ7CXqfm9FXfsP2/J7lIv08mqL/iRhGAoz0uLmKe5H7xjQ+1yqpOcfWEdvZfV/W xQrn7BWzNr9q4p9zaNJnxAAqa7R2J95iTaGR9MbA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.90]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MlNpH-1jQbk12Uwv-00lj1p; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:20:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5686da19-24a4-0401-7a00-a41fab02b920@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:RTkDnKrVxBE9b/656OU+dSSHGaNvas4b7aqVOQzhcRhmH6sRFNL gWCx2u2NYjACUz22rpnQD7xuPscLhJzD6OSG/gP3d/q109b686lEKGC8901oJdLL9fEzv3k ltvtZIeiqvst/BJ5frDJeBwM1yzUn0VPZdY0E1SelEPhrN4ImYYUqH8B+lvKJvbTW/gWqyb GolG1SnbH9w1ED3cW4aog== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:efAptCCV/FE=:p8hGsq/OLCuuDy0HwQARgT T4z5EOA+A5pIuF2NyIkAv0WrzzfW7794ysB4XHf13Fvha87otRqQDiwpGsU0mxdLd/CQti4Kd DCqW7Kf8wAu0Re4HPqet094j7cXRa67a6WpErNRqgM4HZUI4KU9mn9O1re1CyKwdp5iGGUfMB lGfMdrk4RLnJPS2xUk3z871sOG6wbbrOXVqGQU1bASqTUTh8XtAfkZTBkyVOxCsjxxgL5WwgR L7tfrxO4JowwhFLa7wcdprj+ZSPUKjH4GX1+Jpp8RxxtsVvzq8+QITDNrCMFOqg2QNbjpHDdB kpTnN+zbLVCxsK8QaipQTZK40GLtl+tjNERjxetvYkAz7bB5vG4t/1mdsanj2eqsLKesZNLId XaPzojRVrt3Nk12mhY3MXLA8EgpRITFOiVgOYvsmBa1K0dFagaaBK5MoGfAzkYk0Khf1QAA3S 4fW1WDZNfc26IbtPx6a+0cZhU9jmWVMA+waeyGgQevVVliW3P5aR51EnhcP/ebQw7buRQ2ACQ LQ8vWnl9dsgSPiFU5qWMA1WUaYqP2OuL48TPInnoq8vJBFU2z7W5Y+MveRC9L/IbtQbRNh3lz MGKQKfOYs931ZwnlKu+NTpf5bCNBBoIaWtwjHgrzkUzw1sTfRPo8ePNrpsK0tnDKMvLDmfTPJ mZWdVbyQ/alLfToOjyo5p8PPKEB0TolWyzwxtKc2Q+2WwmisFGi/OtgmcEB4teeBx4/PJwrIz 60mCN30V75lxrp+GzjfpcL/ah0g/wDqKOSRjUNH1789JvSI+ciHomyX/BaBgtb1BCCdfwxOP X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244712 Archived-At: >> >> Dragging the right and bottom borders too? Here dragging any border is >> >> usually smooth with very occasional jumps. But it's much better than >> >> moving. >> > >> > Yes. I described that later in the previous email. >> >> It just doesn't make sense. Moving a frame is a no-brainer, regardless >> of whether you do it via the title bar or via the mode li > > Resizing the frame. Dragging the borders (right and bottom too) resizes the frame, and doing that with an un-decorated normal frame exhibits the same broken resizing behavior. We have miscommunicated here: First I wrote that resizing is "much better than moving" (because dragging a border is resizing) and you apparently agreed with "Yes. I described that later in the previous email.". Then I meant that "Moving a frame is a no-brainer" and you responded with "Resizing the frame.". Either way, both resizing and moving are broken. martin