From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix use of sockaddr_in Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 13:15:56 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <5f0ab130-bf42-c6e3-5eed-7b3bc2296f9f@cs.ucla.edu> References: <83shk989r5.fsf@gnu.org> <20170513150837.31184-1-phst@google.com> <83h90o8zt9.fsf@gnu.org> <877f1kefhi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83a86g8siw.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3u0cyjy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <838tm088yj.fsf@gnu.org> <8337c78qq6.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgpv5xa0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495052216 22587 195.159.176.226 (17 May 2017 20:16:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 20:16:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 Cc: phst@google.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 17 22:16:52 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5NL-0005kh-87 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:16:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5NQ-0007kC-K3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55647) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Me-0007k4-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Md-0005t0-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:50648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5MY-0005qw-Fh; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD2016007A; Wed, 17 May 2017 13:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id kMLwVuDb4Tkn; Wed, 17 May 2017 13:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D8B160091; Wed, 17 May 2017 13:15:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nMNBccaFltbt; Wed, 17 May 2017 13:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2E0B16007A; Wed, 17 May 2017 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lgpv5xa0.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214930 Archived-At: On 05/17/2017 08:16 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I wonder why you ignored what I said here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-05/msg00361.html I had forgotten about that comment. And it took such an odd approach ("Oh, let's refuse to run on any implementation that has an unusual struct sockaddr layout, even though it's easy to write portable code that works well") that it shouldn't be surprising that I forgot about it. However, you evidently prefer the odd approach so we'll try things your way.