From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Stjernholm Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-vars.el Date: 22 Nov 2002 03:00:58 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5bfztu8isl.fsf@lister.roxen.com> References: <200211180057.JAA24537@etlken.m17n.org> <5bbs4m8qz9.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <5bwun97ecw.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <20021119165749.GA27657@gnu.org> <5b65utkyqt.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <200211201358.gAKDwsG21304@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200211211855.gALIt7q06098@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037930807 9794 80.91.224.249 (22 Nov 2002 02:06:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 02:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, d.love@dl.ac.uk, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18F3DR-0002Xq-00 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 03:06:45 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18F3HO-0000O7-00 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 03:10:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18F396-0000nu-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:02:16 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18F37x-00082Z-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:01:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18F37w-00080E-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:01:05 -0500 Original-Received: from godzilla.roxen.com ([194.52.182.190] helo=mail.roxen.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18F37v-0007xd-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from lister.roxen.com (lister.roxen.com [194.52.182.147]) by mail.roxen.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E80399BE; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 03:00:59 +0100 (MET) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: <200211211855.gALIt7q06098@rum.cs.yale.edu> Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9618 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9618 "Stefan Monnier" wrote: > Yes, just like (defvar foo): it wouldn't define the function but would > instead just declare that there exist such a function somewhere and > that the byte-compiler should consequently not emit any warning about it. This would suit me well, at least. Are these declarations local to the current compilation? If not then I think it'd be a good idea to make them so, to avoid that the warnings are covered in packages that are compiled later on.