From: Martin Stjernholm <mast@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, d.love@dl.ac.uk, handa@m17n.org,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: cc-vars.el
Date: 22 Nov 2002 03:00:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bfztu8isl.fsf@lister.roxen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200211211855.gALIt7q06098@rum.cs.yale.edu>
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu> wrote:
> Yes, just like (defvar foo): it wouldn't define the function but would
> instead just declare that there exist such a function somewhere and
> that the byte-compiler should consequently not emit any warning about it.
This would suit me well, at least.
Are these declarations local to the current compilation? If not then I
think it'd be a good idea to make them so, to avoid that the warnings
are covered in packages that are compiled later on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-22 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E18CrrF-0005AT-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <rzqwunberel.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
2002-11-18 0:57 ` cc-vars.el Kenichi Handa
2002-11-18 19:09 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-18 19:51 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-18 22:15 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-19 1:40 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-19 15:45 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-19 16:57 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-19 21:58 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-20 2:22 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-20 13:58 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-20 15:43 ` cc-vars.el Kim F. Storm
2002-11-20 15:01 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-20 16:37 ` cc-vars.el Kim F. Storm
2002-11-24 19:32 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-24 19:30 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-20 21:29 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-20 21:44 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-22 1:51 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-21 17:12 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-21 18:55 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-22 2:00 ` Martin Stjernholm [this message]
2002-11-20 16:40 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-20 16:35 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-19 16:59 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-20 21:14 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-24 19:33 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-20 21:41 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-24 19:36 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-19 7:49 ` cc-vars.el Kai Großjohann
2002-11-19 16:55 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-19 20:35 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-20 9:46 ` cc-vars.el Kai Großjohann
2002-11-21 17:12 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-20 16:38 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-18 22:17 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-19 17:01 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bfztu8isl.fsf@lister.roxen.com \
--to=mast@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@m17n.org \
--cc=miles@lsi.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).