From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Stjernholm Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-vars.el Date: 19 Nov 2002 22:58:50 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5b65utkyqt.fsf@lister.roxen.com> References: <200211180057.JAA24537@etlken.m17n.org> <5bbs4m8qz9.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <5bwun97ecw.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <20021119165749.GA27657@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037743196 7371 80.91.224.249 (19 Nov 2002 21:59:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dave Love , Kenichi Handa , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18EGPQ-0001uh-00 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:59:52 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18EGSK-0005X8-00 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:02:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18EGOr-0002k2-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:59:17 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18EGOX-0002fW-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:58:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18EGOV-0002fF-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:58:56 -0500 Original-Received: from godzilla.roxen.com ([194.52.182.190] helo=mail.roxen.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18EGOU-0002f2-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from lister.roxen.com (lister.roxen.com [194.52.182.147]) by mail.roxen.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C34299AC; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:58:50 +0100 (MET) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <20021119165749.GA27657@gnu.org> Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9554 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9554 Miles Bader wrote: > /.../ A few extra fboundp checks at load-time are so utterly > inconsequential that it's hardly worth worrying about the possibility that > they might be generated in some cases. What makes you think they are restricted to load time code? > Do you have _real_ examples of a case where this method causes problems? > If not, we shouldn't waste time wondering if there _might_ be some -- this > simply isn't a very important issue. I got bugged by users enough to come up with the whole cc-bytecomp kludge, at least. What would be the problem of adding a macro in the bytecomp environment to control the warning aspect only? That has to be simpler than recognizing the if-form. It's not like it's an either-or issue between two irreconcilable solutions.