From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:34:45 +0300 Message-ID: <5a2268d3-180c-fac9-8a1f-4b0cbb438d2d@yandex.ru> References: <8wXYP4GY9hwW-9mYv6_LGMETZ8Vz3Ob1Bec6yh6kPT7yxjTkxA3V6dXY4ELra9tYiJUxJmgXKSIEX4w8HFiPRoeGVSQHDSoBVy1voj1e3Qo=@protonmail.com> <83imhzecc5.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2qvcjv6.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12ed20s.fsf@gnu.org> <83blnqctyj.fsf@gnu.org> <9341072a-cf53-9092-2211-aa97c946e5b1@yandex.ru> <838sinfygb.fsf@gnu.org> <16fad982-e95b-7df1-25d0-1c666a6f8120@gmail.com> <83tv1begq5.fsf@gnu.org> <525fe795-0716-a224-ded0-00e49548aa3d@yandex.ru> <83lfmne9z1.fsf@gnu.org> <67546075-1419-acd2-53cd-f44d101bc26b@yandex.ru> <83k127e8vc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="39228"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 22 19:35:35 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRJHa-000A5Z-RT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:35:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRJHZ-0004Kh-UK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:35:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRJGt-0003Qv-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRJGs-0000wQ-NA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::331]:37986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRJGr-0000tG-VV; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:34:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id g12so3415782wmh.3; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yrKf6MyrOgM/UKLm5F8it8lmPdfB/kDVqgwIJmjb66I=; b=LpGBHYZTgF/m3QHWleU3YZv/C7t6+KkJowZEUKzzlZH0EgnCdGaq1Kooc5+CDm0Rvf jTEJ9Fg+o/6Ai7PMpyMNe2xaD02QhrW7iYu/ar+1tyuvm8rCKZOacRvBdbHFLC+zXJ5r Giwd3t+bJzHkksC03fCbaxqO7OQAuEA5JQ/ifyhveU/kkadPzSgV95Y+P7r+ZmN30ZGC KhtlfmcnrQw1xZTCXWrySfuzRGxN9NQpG82X7wpsJjvgp24iqVZJZiuD/Q85uNBoqmm8 3cELFuwawSdAiAOBmZVx+1xhWaza6v7t5434W3CkJUoxirii6RffnlZ3h53BMHHY1teD j7YA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yrKf6MyrOgM/UKLm5F8it8lmPdfB/kDVqgwIJmjb66I=; b=WaFPRzni6Sh1SqJAG2Qnc37wa5z5PTQaDlvG/Y14ggJN+aOCyuFLerDgFXqNi7NCUS tXkVdy9fdZegonZvgefqikAwmEncf7KqVUszxOBLpIyA4uH0GZ5/2m3Fuu0mKwDrvZfY VCjYS5/PdEaPVRznra0v/1lrwb2gE9Z9ll96jDgS0WqFVsRYdK6NiaUDUCk8bq5i8lhB XAA7pXS2f0Z2gyFtMi+FAl8DNEGgsr4xnzhNzzrbIN7GXl/DTv5g/QO75sPfLAD6OL+/ WRtc39rpjnJBo1YJ/VgjiWPvTPeyAGRzA3YGsXyi5VlqA0zX6rjWxkH6VNG1BleEQP1n sJiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYi/6UNAPRS5SUDLHn8ErLLRCMsPzuxHu1UiHeyYuVDOPicvhlz MMVLoDj/LLSf33LyqFqfW+xBunLbb3U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIoM0JvwLZwbkOlJraU1M5/oUhPWhpYmKE5HeJ9HKe8v/R8PAsoSS2K47VIu1RH2jgqUpdASA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1008:: with SMTP id c8mr11238476wmc.14.1587576887841; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm9836961wrg.27.2020.04.22.10.34.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k127e8vc.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::331; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x331.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67 X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::331 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247536 Archived-At: On 22.04.2020 20:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> No, the icons looks different across themes. Hence the whole notion of >> "icon themes". But the set of icon names is fairly stable. This is what >> we'd be relying on. > But a given theme is not available universally, not even with the same > toolkit, I guess? Indeed, it isn't. Although there's always the standard theme for GNOME (Adwaita) and the latest Ubuntu theme, we can look at those. I'm not sure how that's important, though. >> On GTK, we're already there. Since 22.2, apparently. Only we haven't >> been paying attention to keeping this feature in proper maintenance. > I'm asking people to think whether we_want_ that. That we are one > leg there doesn't yet mean we decided to do that consciously. You are > suggesting to make that a policy, and that's a serious decision, IMO. First of all, I'm suggesting we fix how the icons look in the GTK build. Then you are welcome to discuss whether macOS and Windows could use something like that. And whether they should. Since you're skeptical of this approach from the outset, I'd rather bow out of that discussion.