From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: C-j considered harmful (not really) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:05:45 -0800 Message-ID: <5DF050342F7C45B184054D763D86EBF7@us.oracle.com> References: <912155b0911161437l7d5d5d3h790edff279fdad7a@mail.gmail.com><7b501d5c0911161451s3e54e48dve127bd144f2affc8@mail.gmail.com><877htpjwd4.fsf@mail.jurta.org><912155b0911221236t7cebbb35n4bc10805bb685c1e@mail.gmail.com><87zl6dk2pz.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <912155b0911230311m60103693j6331866d97ab8179@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258988882 32570 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2009 15:08:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, 'Stefan Monnier' , 'Deniz Dogan' To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?'Per_Starb=E4ck'?=" , "'Juri Linkov'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 16:07:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCaW6-00051O-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:07:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46154 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCaW6-0001Xk-6W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCaUH-0000Ep-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCaUE-0000Bt-0F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39721 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCaUD-0000Bj-Qb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:36586 helo=rgminet12.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCaUC-0008Rp-Lk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by rgminet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id nANF5Xe7021535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:05:35 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id nANDdnTq009312; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:07:29 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt021.oracle.com by acsmt356.oracle.com with ESMTP id 538552321258988730; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:05:30 -0800 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.5.185.59) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:05:29 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <912155b0911230311m60103693j6331866d97ab8179@mail.gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcpsM4mH3jDx3PlKSzG8352nuZYWfAAGMXMQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Source-IP: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4B0AA4BE.00E4:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117588 Archived-At: > Right. I'd like to see that as another question (regardless of whether > S-return = C-j or not), that it's unnecessary to have both RET and > C-j for minibuffer-complete-and-exit, so it would be better to have > C-j do newline there. > > Probably some people are used to using C-j there? Yes, in Icicles, `C-j' is self-inserting in the minibuffer. Likewise `SPC' and `?'. Why? Because in Icicles it is not rare for completions or input text to contain such chars.