From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scratch buffer annoyance Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:10:51 +0100 Message-ID: <5D2E8CD0-9BDB-4F78-90F5-0013EA813600@gmail.com> References: <877ipev1iv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87lkdhqp94.fsf@red-bean.com> <20070716203244.85A0A30116@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <8ACF1129-2D04-4157-83F8-0F0F8928A5D2@gmail.com> <86myxvrpc6.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1184688730 6354 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2007 16:12:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 17 18:12:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IApef-0001rH-ON for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:12:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IApef-00082c-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IApda-0007T4-9z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:10:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IApdY-0007Ry-M9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IApdY-0007Rs-Fj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:10:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IApdY-0005tD-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:10:56 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 34so183205ugf for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:10:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=RpCkj+z4notDGE3ITZ4c0rM6AbMYOn6P/BQB0uTxYo5XKfsofCb1E+TUy0PYVG66fxaoXtFm5NTec1PZBmMs0JDraOR83Dxa0xmQi+O98QpWV7J2sFRxl8ojB+d3qaV5FZ842fcbtFO1SEd6ZAVSf06Qn4XWLzGoDKJ7txpCXXY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=RLra9m34Mydx0LMG9v0COVSWPycR3R942zGxav4TUVy2hD0wB9NU07fuuFq3uyj8LJ2Bv62+QfXUCu3bGmxlnfGZvRhjWUayVm8dK6/6L8YAJwjakbv/BS+galgYMUnhZ8/MaABCCpvqljp2xCGROEDT5amDESXqxqAKigmip2M= Original-Received: by 10.67.121.18 with SMTP id y18mr441959ugm.1184688654995; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?129.215.174.81? ( [129.215.174.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j1sm4517132ugf.2007.07.17.09.10.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:10:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86myxvrpc6.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74996 Archived-At: On 17 Jul 2007, at 17:02, David Kastrup wrote: > That it doesn't work when one has more than one Emacs active at one > time. It is not like we have not been through that already. Then deal with that problem, e.g. by asking the user "scratch file changed on disk - really save?" at the end of the session. One could even synchronize the buffer across sessions (automatic revert-buffer when needed). Are there no modes for collaborative editing around?