From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display-buffer-use-some-frame Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:49 +0100 Message-ID: <5C10C775.20305@gmx.at> References: <5BD601F9.2010708@gmx.at> <8636r3g8s8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544603493 11330 195.159.176.226 (12 Dec 2018 08:31:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC) To: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 12 09:31:29 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWzvS-0002mJ-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43126 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWzxY-0007ni-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:33:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45673) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWzwA-0007Ob-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:32:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWzw8-0006sJ-5A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:32:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:48005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWzw6-0006rD-DB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.37]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhOvA-1hAVfY1Epc-00mXoI; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8636r3g8s8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:e/cJoPju+91tsU051c2n6S2bLS04XCoFoG6WTUeVbAqJ4e7k9Vt g6Qv57FK3Qd3SekOCEA3ejoMxTipCpKXYy6NcNQFJcdqdvgvrzuyyyB7aMvJsfvy7qFstA2 8grhc7E01ICTxM6DEAsV7tKhkUekDH+GHfhoN85fkXM2EF/ue9X3rTaZCOLwBphffJMfwkl Ch65mCo0H57KQKfY8WSbg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:wsEZvMLjyaw=:+3La4ie8yDRpDelaneEjQr P3hmtOeRgfI7XAhjqL0FTppNtpRrdgzcO4m37sYv9B/HNw/HanesK3q5oFp0qFZBbkFq3gKEq rWibuOXlwAjLoobvj5J6MqD5qfiV2gRTvRTz9rAjSNby90Ji8kMb443ckGRtLPj3wN/pdClEv ren3lPEzN6zdgXXsPxYU0ZJdmVtVgXLtbS9GQKSUEDEBvpeQgi/zcUPZK8Iazr9a/7X86nWYl ElWbv5Oi596K2XkRzLo3zbbFgXy2joaktTicn9YMGC4ejeLC2Wa7bYn1FLxvU4Y4ma8yWw6Q5 5EVHyHTpR1CyKdSWSQERWrVj0TBLEWl8OL/+VfJmdGXMKDCVkpDkdsA5kkQYTKfFCcT27qEIJ 6BQR3L7ES7if7kS2Zs0rqBLpcsgQrY69P9MPbjSOREP4rAC0lk1nK766uUZO0iU9AjXTq+u7A rTdCQ06s+qOuHDR66uF7/HVqtZZbUdHRH+lYFiJxzq804pirGztwIIVw87/oWajpC1eOlk1f8 j6IMKpscxQY8oT2xoYsOiX1ISMFcLynEHpfyewJUAHiROPwVal8m2k+bZLEK42NDu1z3gAVXD EAcLE/z1FbXwZK2WuKWs1z4cK2wILqH83iBSnh/Hb95GEpvXjsjZxsMDdpeCd+QpovhG0KBLr kv7FlicVCnJxG/BpBAgsIC/NwmKrnnFjrUhxl+CE9vqlO/B+lcdxOexQv2/UONNU1tKcNzfdG onw6dvcbFoFlgOF046G2TXPvh6BzFtVXr+7p8jz4Xe5QQFcsZyxbk+zkacbKY16oeKRUjUEe X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231773 Archived-At: >> - In the call >> >> (window--display-buffer >> buffer window 'frame alist display-buffer-mark-dedicated) >> >> you should write 'reuse instead of 'frame. The latter means that a >> new frame has been made but you just reuse an existing window. I >> noticed this because I made the same error in (an undocumented part >> of) 'display-buffer-in-child-frame'. > > I'll fix this after the test below. Fine. >> Also, I wonder why you call >> 'frame-first-window' here: >> >> (not (window-dedicated-p >> (or >> (get-lru-window frame) >> (frame-first-window frame))))) > > I don't remember. I'll test for a while without it. Please do that. Thanks, martin