From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current master does not work with sr-speedbar package (W64 build) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 14:16:59 +0100 Message-ID: <5C0A72CB.7090200@gmx.at> References: <1723869815.291238.1543945851468@mail.libero.it> <831s6x9ntx.fsf@gnu.org> <1892341033.303375.1543966279338@mail.libero.it> <835zw7961j.fsf@gnu.org> <1181980169.366424.1544051247329@mail.libero.it> <83va476u3t.fsf@gnu.org> <115637468.396419.1544086829368@mail.libero.it> <83mupj6mlm.fsf@gnu.org> <1416933916.408019.1544095693412@mail.libero.it> <1266357133.430788.1544118598533@mail.libero.it> <5C0A1D9F.1080803@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544188582 7067 195.159.176.226 (7 Dec 2018 13:16:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 14:16:18 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gVFzO-0001lC-6W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 14:16:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46236 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVG1U-00059M-K7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:18:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVG0a-00059D-OL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVG0V-00060x-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:17:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:50481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVG0U-0005u1-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:17:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.119]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LZzKf-1hCXun1EEP-00lolT; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 14:17:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VFwhOQ6c6wSR43cQfEYb1h6wmPlGb+/aegzhJDSjOGAFZ5I5mDe IAMOuOEY19KL69pg/f8wrgbMF5HxZnHFrzlPWKbnm1dcg9Mb6t4MJ+6IG2TFuMmekD/FhAo ffeXLO/ZIUPk8rwOfBxQ5phMO8tsk7ovZFZoGlODaguERmAILU6554fFRq7atDGbXOosQpc RQRuMm3Y2Te40KsTAC4IQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:F+AsoBqwbxc=:F9KGlWL/kIP8SklxXLPLMw fifc8coyHmMMAWoMabed/LkL3U+OZkIBKi24QrYrFHGKD56avDRqcX7TX0wXAuRimadTIeVd5 FRb4ts2S7o9MpsfAxPJNv7Ozin50BygQOKhiCJ7Hm8WpIQHE0LnwyeWOxS4K4w18OYKa6P/bt Ii8/bsaE1kylQUDg+DJ34+GWoN/at18nI+SN2fDaPNvM8QAbyxTR7eNV/Q88YkqwIg5RBWyM7 uuJXzPZ6J5z9jLwrTVESuueCysNu4BfTYq7F/p5rRVuzVH9GTY8J+Jn9TXu7HD4j2bFPw154H wTfHcAezMePeRP35A0fL/eWylHmc9s4DEhSdkl+q2S4mV2zXhkQpFwuKaMPnWts4FXdG2s4Oo wXK1rfQzUaKXzc0nDO31qzBayuEl0CSLioejQCKodHG5u1NczWhiaGwA21Zd+FN1lw6je/g+G +J8PIWy5AFcpVWHbs8qGxvBaJeVepgnyi1b6zR7AF7WaiC6DqkP8ChN2UDX3RNP863xp49jT2 nb4XqEACvRzAXH61jlFCRBBrafGMSt3D1aRQXMhw90Q6OwHU0MHa+RRvi+ZIHidntD7GPccvs Jc7CIEajuE8Aua4g10vZVnBU4KQZxLu9i4pqOd/yQPEhLBMLDvc96HAwSSmPaYyfKms9CQdNS UuvQB5bgFxH0zQxoNVzbArb+9gWVULFHhG/iGePGeXKcPsvcU1VVWL5Y+QqOtLEO9qNZaiw3C VNF3/BzZnJEV7+ZX1bMf+dfdvJo3VHMpVf0rnSrqvQcdIB7zxJexxdDgQ+UsSb5pNTmoZsxo X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231711 Archived-At: >> Can you tell me how package.elc _could_ be loaded after you gave it the >> >> ;;\sno-byte-compile: t >> >> directive? > > There is not supposed to be such a directive. At least here package.el > does get compiled. Maybe it's a bug we fixed already? Not here. When I remove the offending line it gets compiled. So you probably should invent something more sophisticated ;-) martin