From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Documenting buffer display Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:18:55 +0200 Message-ID: <5BCF660F.3060902@gmx.at> References: <5BCB1D82.3020108@gmx.at> <834ldgvjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <5BCB6DAE.30209@gmx.at> <83mur7tq4f.fsf@gnu.org> <5BCD92FF.8070905@gmx.at> <838t2qt79v.fsf@gnu.org> <5BCE21AC.6030904@gmx.at> <831s8hu6i8.fsf@gnu.org> <5BCEE2B5.9090205@gmx.at> <0900cd2f-cc4e-45ab-8da1-519bd3b75576@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540318701 26371 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2018 18:18:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 23 20:18:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gF1Fw-0006lr-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:18:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43710 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF1I2-0007Nf-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF1HH-0006zM-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF1HE-0000Fs-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:19:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:41337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF1Gm-0008Jr-5s; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.191]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUHbK-1g5Z6V0B98-00R1Af; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:19:01 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.191]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUHbK-1g5Z6V0B98-00R1Af; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:19:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0900cd2f-cc4e-45ab-8da1-519bd3b75576@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Y3jprZQD0TOXh7DFF3qfFCAxYf0etJBUG+dU+m0pCIgG/bEEeIR WH5yNIpdIhQz69NaMEkBa9MWr9G+lO2VnV+n6h0A6DjmJT+9h7uBap07mXdhzvPQgZfQn42 FTdzT7Xmnan5GWhvA7CWP/Z+qiYv0U6pBVJZ2RtkZ8PjiCi91RwE/KbthYM607jFFKS5pcC niJ1NEL/ODdo80auYzOjw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:jEt+wuEfAHg=:izV7bbNCt835dcKKbRrq0C 7dNyVk3gOQL974BsheY4KJJZXDq+Hp07HjFwdGXEpvbldpt7KMcQ9DpvIIKyWSi+9qTyLejHn OcM9V6HaKToWJgo8p8jnBIx3EF5k7bP+7CJZFoVaKXhPKheHR3Li+Wydqcgsy/By/PeeRAxuA gsyeaf67D3Abc/vEEWteQ6wNr4iKVkpuLWhRJiAG+qfkEGQyBN5ptkAu/DhnWamw9xuwAeCNS pIS27GCf/JmatHg/A+jKUhrYUr+CISIdEYvtsaJ6jcuHjbE6H/UjXxyseWFK1Uc1H/TBlHSMi A0I1MMXBRH42+X13D6GAlTnfToZqYQ4V8uxbi3YQ+2rIg8QNLUYST1iynCqpYuGl7uT/xsOBi aG2SsjYdT77TbYgMRuvZ5tAGpZi1LnxeAMMNIbwm3FLCkvgHOwKbdjNP5y47S4nPnpdcq5BNU e3KcRFnQ3DYHdhs/dG2+xvJt8Wkna3QGt+iAIJuDxLB0Yk2CPfZWdA4NpHfWXjORTL5h3itjh enk1hY8r0XUAdgSdchOqeOIfiuwjoMBfURcbkn/HnW0V8ApXafBuNefaEUzKt4a2c4rmybfzq rrr4gi9pDNcPkKZb9EYTZ6bdl2/RcuZRbPXxd6OZkGKSBRVg0t/AWqrEkAuJb9KFsh2onKFep JEGBiBb2K4EG/MN+5Eeh4nEsK2eFKWC9x5vAhL6mFNUyH+6cH8aeVE7q5/qcCYDvFaBiGqK0c l6aquSCW32lCtbl4d20gcP8/VOmHfMNlPm9j/6P+JlevLu5Sjx4UfSU1nHXJwJRBkZZGAL41 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230602 Archived-At: >> I did not object to your changes when you made them because with Drew >> such objections inevitably lead to discussions why 'display-buffer' >> does it all wrong and why its earlier behavior was so much superior. > > Seriously? Yes. I'm afraid stating my opinion in the context of 'display-buffer' because OT1H I do not feel responsible for its present implementation and OTOH I feel obliged to defend it because its implementers won't. > This is what the discussion has devolved to? Sadly, yes. martin