From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Documenting buffer display Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:02:47 +0200 Message-ID: <5BCB6DC7.50800@gmx.at> References: <5BCB1D82.3020108@gmx.at> <969a77ef-233b-428f-bf08-dba31d7cb895@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540058497 1020 195.159.176.226 (20 Oct 2018 18:01:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 18:01:37 +0000 (UTC) To: Drew Adams , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 20 20:01:33 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDvZ6-0000Ap-LA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:01:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56140 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDvbC-0002SD-Rp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDvb3-0002KR-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:03:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDvaQ-0003qF-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:48023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDvaQ-0003pX-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:02:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.73.147]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LztD9-1fZYcd3LNb-014zcf; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:02:48 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.73.147]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LztD9-1fZYcd3LNb-014zcf; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:02:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <969a77ef-233b-428f-bf08-dba31d7cb895@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:EHsgQwjJkIzJQMDFfR2+S8oAPjlIYPiHVnbxvMGF46Ld6OhQqu8 DnkVPD1YeAFPuDm3uNNeACO2TS/jPTrN5RCzX13RuUyZDBbbNiL2a7mdoDfYq5qsWCfdSWq pIq8fPIqYNNBYgRYV7dtpyZI1ylVmohWmOzQJ+DPEqzvGoPGB4kYqOHkPIQzwvrjZ8IP5Fz wV/mrtdajsdRQjLq94tWA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:I46KQqMN9Kk=:nUItNQUy4J2VdwlG2nu1ff /AYbB5EJ87yBEZFx0xM9SSEtDYRLdkXiYfU6//Aem16BxH2MtmjTLVqsfw8duBFZ9oL4Uk2yo epV+b6w1irEMi8TdDLPyonU+TLgnTf1zBUYZAP9/8CcjOHHSKSv+98Xffp8ym2kjhIZG27rlI UjFejvimFPgZ545afWXh0kuePWn7R+ryC9OeojHMEDsegji5VSAahhMr3eJlH+vVFYws//a27 Ht21Pudv32WOsDF9e3cI2ddfy84ZG7kY9pnzRMXUX5qGGB8K4WzlQySXsSwhiU6aMeQsCooyi ov61yIMj/EXRHNUFNAfMzxXBBjZ3zPlGYqjl7yEdXpUMKKO7KHt3joZ25UP+aEhZ8SMm9EjjA xZS+wQ+AC0cUcDq1RSmVZ5DoL1vR0ff+HC9sGX8AO0E40UI244zfum3jjLV4i+NYRe7RsOPIe OabLIJwhOQbgEgOeEUFGtkux3tE8F4ApRh2h7QZj5WvYxKIxiMd8N9Gp1jxlcKnf3jKZjxfk+ 4Dk98F5OWjFDcAq/VCIsubioccS3NZS2/08MsUP8RVuuyZxrriOsoZMykh4wj3OOzxAHzNDfI JS2zRAseoKr1AluDG6Mxs/DKZ8kgOqB0951LlW7rnhRYwC07KP2rwYTr6JKLBZ9D/QznezuFg qs5zuJjASwYA6kmMPC3u93aT+tR4q7NcevCdjg49j80VPs89WDwYV/PyLv48/wkVDuqXaUO42 LElDOlcZNel1Yg+X6inojz90CR+sl2fpEpga8NelbrLxWvarTEBQGHLUL8zMElDS7M3cHX2N X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230526 Archived-At: > Being able to simply bind an option such as `pop-up-frames', > to change the behavior of existing code, is very useful. If it overrides a user's customization then that's not useful but bad. > Please keep supporting, and not at all discourage, `pop-up-frames' > and similar. We do our best to support them in present code. We have to discourage their use because there's no guarantee that future code will support them. Have you read what I wrote about 'pop-up-frame-alist'? Already now there's no guarantee that we can maintain these old options properly. And I never tried to probe very deep in this area. martin