From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-26.0.91: switch-to-buffer-other-window runs too slowly (about 0.1s) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:46:57 +0200 Message-ID: <5AB94021.8080700@gmx.at> References: <83efk6g93z.fsf@gnu.org> <544b8346-bda9-45eb-9573-1d51d9f768b2@Spark> <83bmfag8gu.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3ie24z1.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh8m23tc.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1ty22p1.fsf@gmail.com> <837epyg30w.fsf@gnu.org> <83370mg0qj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522089987 25669 195.159.176.226 (26 Mar 2018 18:46:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 26 20:46:23 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f0X8Q-0006ax-8v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:46:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XAT-0001KB-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:48:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0X9D-0001Iw-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:47:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0X9A-0004KV-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:47:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:45923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0X99-0004K7-Tc; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.73.66]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lkfii-1eSZu73Xs4-00aUWM; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:47:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:tPMrn5uX0xCfCwDKVfbs8lZ7el29N/Briejzes0FyZARQZf1en5 DFbqWWF11I/Fc8JSLLwMryo17S1XofJh0qzZ2GnY/BNOy2lKjjV9rDRaOPTBa3Ch8j09y0S NsvmGUMgwVSY43KTfgopWpkRgDbzsXjJLmFlzuvp5d/vCSx/h03GQegUDp4dzNoigWwVlx5 l+HeMEMzNbg9mglzIQdgw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:iLws76oJgb4=:s8VA/7Rb664zS7bXl8CnaU OtAbYVg524vGQG+WKHYrLA/rO/2ens4i3vlWNazoENcDNtUXjotVdPYpi4PSQWOo8UpjPwUJQ m/pSwzn0z+UExrKUU4JdZQdc54X+pFZRDIDucC84c0iKxVdfmVIGByVwxTRzvLsEX4A6EbbUf w5xarIZGeN1hrwIuxGhr22MMQhzHeTRrKFUbbYHBEogvlzI5WnJCFVJSb6jRxKmayAQSQkTEe s4INFT4uIYVwfTmK2s7NTD+CKCf4/R7q8gV4Dv+XGSZf+DSrkQ9V8B8prS3wOze2Q9b6kYl0v pntJO7gT9NIg82zL35SzUtrYIoAstUIs3RFo0IcJ7H9hYOhyZ4gQiVL8hebbsWvRq1981DDrO lS5spe6aZnHaAZGMhC2Q/mbu8b/q/XTitRoAcV4dtnt0QKKz86Vm5MGZ8JYfxuMj7r2TSNSrf pLxM6da3UwEzUwpBvKZhvw49wbQXmJH3accdEL8B1GEWhY9Tbci2iqYRSdPpdlYIJUo034a+U PWwphTjL9md6PfCM4LSuh1C4cBsa3D3XE++mFlio8AG8ihRoGAHSFTpT2icruPo/4ZIENyL60 3t7UDijgPN6hmk0ISGT3ns7jPTRCW2as5nU2ii30T/3avLu71D/wSgO5uqkfMm7g5qab6QVxh Vzgu47thhhYguZQdtqI923951OJQ9cd6XlONEzDl9h98+GYz/vNa4cWaflQxLj75fgiFaFfkm by9WLlp+3fBSfw8oEdvV4vdQkZ1W/tNEumjtsUGVwDBadQsERtUhuHrMwLCM15U4MepiYhxX X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224066 Archived-At: > But I think in the case where we move from window A to window B and both > are on the same frame we should either not call > window--maybe-raise-frame or else that function should do nothing in > that case. Basically, I feel like if the movement is intra-frame than > no frame-level operations should be involved. There's no guarantee that the selected frame is visible at the time `display-buffer' is called. And my GTK Emacs notoriously lies about the visibility of frames anyway. martin