From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: set-frame-parameter a child-frame's 'parent-frame error on macOS ? Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:19:54 +0100 Message-ID: <5A5B3CDA.6010204@gmx.at> References: <3341a4c3.36ca.160e851bdbd.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A5876A3.10402@gmx.at> <87fu7b6zsj.fsf@163.com> <5A5902D9.9070801@gmx.at> <16191b19.1392.160ed773bef.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A59C872.1010900@gmx.at> <87tvvqxcxr.fsf@163.com> <5A59F476.1060806@gmx.at> <87mv1hcnw8.fsf@163.com> <5A5B1D46.6000608@gmx.at> <731a3868-e589-978b-ee34-ab72cf5c5aff@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515928709 5753 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2018 11:18:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Dmitry Gutov , Feng Shu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 14 12:18:25 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eagIq-0000dH-9M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:18:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eagKp-0004DY-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 06:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eagKc-0004CS-Eo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 06:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eagKZ-0002k3-Aq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 06:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:63661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eagKZ-0002jD-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 06:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.201]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6ioC-1epAGx01ie-00wTaQ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:19:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <731a3868-e589-978b-ee34-ab72cf5c5aff@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:q4Y1yiaXq7jI3dA/RHQi95acAwHLZIPY0pqB3/c3N55msfkUsxO ew2/xA7h91er7FVJUR0T8XEHCiMfEVMlGxSIZ8Ov7pYdAx+3vAbH353JKd7PJXtJzfApG1j Z4ipqLlB5IJVKCMSTcyYBdebIwQctFqZLArFFmhQNxTJE7TB/WpnGsJhutw1IVesA1wnZYH ov5i3buPSPR0eTCjF+J/w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:EuA8jFTWsOs=:63Xt1frkBfTdN03VOnp9t4 Rz8xYF0Ehow5g0lNPNdothqp5lZpS2r9k6/6mv9np15DvE83ezDJGVkrmmupBtDE9oMQzaTGD Utf8BjQQwCVBk0XiMO+GUkcVfI+iGYzrMcDhG23IP7Ql01EITTZZv9zVmNTZnWFk3CGMtCHa6 s0GWZAjI8D9PPCXNNpjphT1V+nIq9E4/hl6nG6v7N62ORuz1pvxxegKlHRQrxHeHBw7p4Z6zz JhkMyA0fckzKVxkOelKr/dlHx9bXu3GHS8VdPNCcM886g+tlrm0ETC6anKJCPnB5fSoE+bXQS Byk2t29AY7Vubxw+5pdQtV7UKtnICw/b1jR4onmB3Xffwg9U9BCgAWZm7ydbYUPT3PeQ/HmMK ZNnAYgWJsHvKHmMhwq2Z2r6I1JhI9YimBriAVuJcWo2jQSrpjnzSAXZms0HchlOfZsPRC13W7 X9xc6sPOSH7T575aO1A3JG52AfL74aIEkEBs9ThoXepYzB2lLEgOWIaaWNcJ4mDB4mDEjJhPc Nvthp14kWS9uS5xqkiz1XV+qhZzGG07a6t4oKd5NpwauZfuue/dI/du+i0S29YQl0yhBPJN21 saJLNivuQaTK7Mc2nyWCO+NV2r0S++8Xi6uDf8rl91PJHkVEaQMCOoC91HO1aSZ/NH7JB5kGd mCVq8Zn9EYthR01ZtkN6jSeEuaxdsvfDU653Xeg5GkfdBx50jcOqCuW/DmNJRBQvagU3fE2OH dKsn2Sk+p2e14xkX9q2SlyHJatk2X6qKP00khVPujTmECCUhUxx+N8MMai7cFp9KAsro+QGH X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221953 Archived-At: > Yes. Without it, both positions were far from point. Any idea whether the code asks twice to position the frame? `set-frame-position' is generally a bad idea when creating a new frame. martin