From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fix for bug#29935 copyright-update inserts year at random places Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:19:56 +0100 Message-ID: <5A55E8CC.6040005@gmx.at> References: <868tdh5fag.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <837et0ckou.fsf@gnu.org> <86shbm4ks9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86k1wy48ch.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <861sj54wox.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5A524604.6070909@gmx.at> <5A533F7D.4090505@gmx.at> <5A53B5E1.5080608@gmx.at> <5A548E9B.3050500@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515579571 26318 195.159.176.226 (10 Jan 2018 10:19:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 11:19:27 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDTc-000657-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:19:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58925 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDVc-0005xq-1N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 05:21:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDUS-0005vc-JK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 05:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDUR-0002ez-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 05:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:54658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDUR-0002dr-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 05:20:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.46]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPD8G-1eUplc3aq0-004SvC; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:20:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:g2s/hPz9xAjA6hpBkTDwHYzGVNb+06fETNDi3OR8jklt5j1q6cY mlYRdcrXiFvh4ZR02bYVMgOqnOFscYy3TnrVOqJ0Gg9Vc9Om8CpcOvcY57E4QjanAzKONWZ KJmGtfcMbhiBbjzso2CjP3FhuXrfXdRmC4vIg9cGQfc43zFv4FThhpi55EPIXYs0zal/6Bw BIdl/wYQb+U8IX1cnn1zA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:n7nn2Bw6Qns=:PGXksUF0wjLdcsxH/TA6RJ ntWD1TvaMFrx8u8NtFshlQZP/892G1E9ZFF1WjOLInrjN2oSvurjDTOxG4VlVvH94ErRI990w FYr+gT/TUE73t4z5qr+rTVCm68eB7NHH+QB9hQzH/Fggs9gLDapQhZNcxSVIcGtKVSBNVZ/Df 7m/bGrNVgWUpjz+NbuG8KLjDlke9dK6o2kGeBTHSQZkjqlKMGKO+8uRAz66wKDIbgpVU3WaM4 qn+TG8taWvmVyD97TjG1H9jdvb2/jm8ilsa77dBeW7pjClM1q8Pk2Co/SByMsSdntSLqsKHH0 EG8N5esr8SUZV7HIqbQgnc/XAEHgYP97yYSsKgzm8mHngJCEre0wqsK7ih9X6t0+y6IiByQih 4RWVyWXpY7hvYb3QB2gdYnTX43k5NmeD1Q2O6DLRBzcXQzdlMk/zlCk1Z6u4LoEz2kBYJ/1qN J2yS9hiSZVRDx2ORrpIQqUTZj23jBwSoBPr2F6DGWNtP6QyfV40pRjRGNrsEtTiqZUWtpx8wt +dSSybHrTqJMDwNICgJXSc4v1LdP0kVUReZq164gM36q1WOCQH9i6t2b/xIcsw7Bz28B1PbzC o1/Xgnew78gHQmDk5CQcXh8UKNqyHj3NjJNtJU4oDifjBL3iC16is9Ahgv6aZBTdNxt27enUu 2fsLIZzQkQMWHpkYIZ//1SBUqrYgnEwcxKvXXt+MJv7On3HK+Czy6SdzwcmpCzwThtjGZVPVP kUv8j+FJwEm9F1S+aTWfjgVMnY/3V7EEqfnbNHcx0zzeELSFgfz0EDVhvUsIL+biLg1pJoia X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221782 Archived-At: > Maybe it does. I don't know. My question was simply: what are the two > functions that should be used to display and then undisplay a buffer? > And more importantly, "everyone" should know it, so this pair should be > "advertized" somehow (e.g. in the manual where we talk about > save-window-excursion and about display-buffer?). We have an entire section in the Elisp manual entitled * Quitting Windows:: How to restore the state prior to displaying a buffer. Can you tell me why this is not sufficient? martin