From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to create a small child-frame which only show two lines Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:50:55 +0100 Message-ID: <5A30E9EF.4020909@gmx.at> References: <32764281.548.1602e496fa6.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A290998.6030900@gmx.at> <5A2A6572.4060700@gmx.at> <65440769.c307.16036041a32.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A2BBC7E.9020400@gmx.at> <65b6adf3.bf1.16042f29094.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A2E28CF.6010405@gmx.at> <17dd098a.99e0.16044b145db.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A2F99B3.6000800@gmx.at> <83a7ynswpo.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513155137 451 195.159.176.226 (13 Dec 2017 08:52:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tumashu@163.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 13 09:52:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eP2lw-0008O9-Qr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:52:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34381 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eP2m4-0005JP-2g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:52:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eP2kw-0005Hz-OP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:51:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eP2kw-0001iZ-1q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:51:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:50486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eP2ku-0001gE-LS; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.11]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3eDF-1fFuI52OED-00rHkU; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:51:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83a7ynswpo.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yHCgOzEhF/uORBb5z3dlgHIydBcwDdebZQg2u8dPkV/nB9S+gBT bMjpAQ7YjLhWlJhmev0Fp+J8c9k4cZP1xKLJdsfZJILK4bpk6DMGLFh8Ea8sTZNdQO2scJw H5o7nR/qOv98ypGd0sSKsWBHoum0zBi+Whk4CehxmvcU/LV3dxvKXVPUzqA0QtpWl6kIezq pzEFxDZuJDROSQSByGWFw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:E8UyPbYb6XM=:H5JJMa4lfPTSeVABlyEwnO 82mS6V5gTjBvM5TpSr+yhwZOeWNB8QomGZO3QWrbf5FK0fmSp9NMHCDg1yMzerr+BSGy0mDWw Fa2b3wS5GRCP0TMZBJ9h1b/3ZxnLCMMJTAlF8bE9bKBKkNQr/znso6kPqEaOkOUeKLXyQDH0O FawkGgKOd7tcU6x8VB5uAaBtZGfq5q1RwLNxINaneKTdqFEgksUQetRMuvvDNVNyoczjULwgL +onE7gRiqkPuUvotMNIZy2CLkMlAd5ZicTW2oOaafxR4t3v8PF4MEzYkQu5Fel1jaUP35kUyo XFrDNJ2v2XtFqeRKDjvTx4wRPZw8Ff/r9IQzIgwHklgrPPzPj88KFjCXyrrZ/YHwRimDjmayh 9CQpY9m3SwIt4ltELsjNjgiYCbN1IJ3aUQN6IqRwJK9R4rBlT7hqBeScoZwvBWjfMMATwuULY Rr1pyPPU6pXKnyR+mNWfZPUP6u0u7bZI6HU/ymUwnSrtGPH1xeZwNSBjGXDwFhqmVyzMbPJSW v6l2nBwQty//WyY0hE5SNeSpHdiVtZnAs20vKe6iLqyOqd++2RD0LqPtOkz7oibofvtAdLvpq WqH5gYybkVfnz4tqO1bdnYBPmgW3OmPfgtS1ciLQ2wGxOFh4sJU89fuwBSwRgUp9hWNWARG3u AnNklfnPFkl36WQxtO/u2Fs+0Bb7s3vLy3jTvnlxcKeXIsPCp6omuc155iGQlhNitIfnjwSS3 RxZmMsj1+vByK5fekix4tEoeHf/VfP2mmboevlac+QGIlZM0I9Ik8ScDNOjNRu2lz8UYED/Q X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220988 Archived-At: >> FWIW this bug should have been fixed more than six years ago. > > AFAIU you are saying that it _is_ fixed, so you wonder why the OP > seems to see it. If so, I concur. E.g., I couldn't reproduce the > original problem in an Info buffer (which does have a header-line). > > Or am I missing something? I didn't want to exclude the possibility that the OP found a scenario how to resurrect that bug. martin