unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: "'Lennart Borgman'" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Cc: 'David De La Harpe Golden' <david@harpegolden.net>,
	'Chong Yidong' <cyd@stupidchicken.com>,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org, 'Juri Linkov' <juri@jurta.org>,
	'Dan Nicolaescu' <dann@ics.uci.edu>,
	'Stefan Monnier' <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
	'Miles Bader' <miles@gnu.org>
Subject: RE: Darkening font-lock colors
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:54:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5908857581A447C3865D9DD2BA70BA16@us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e01d8a50908031557v4cd54e08h1cd5457f2b81e25@mail.gmail.com>

> Maybe, but a good default is also good to have.

Yes, a _good_ default. My point was that if you start trading off between
accessibility, usability, and who-knows-what-else, the result might not be so
good.

I certainly agree that themes are not the place to start, and that we should try
for good defaults. You, not I, pointed out the conflicts between different sets
of criteria. My point was that you will respect none of those sets if you try a
half-way compromise (probably).

> I think jumping into themes right away would just prevent 
> good defaults.

Dunno if it would prevent anything, but I agree that good defaults come first.
 
> > 2. FWIW, I am against having both foregrounds and 
> backgrounds defined for faces
> > such as font-lock faces, that is, for the default values. 
> Distracting & ugly.
> 
> I think it is helpful that makes for exampel comments stand out a bit
> as I said because it holds those pieces of text together and a bit
> apart from other text. This is the same use they often have in a web
> page.

We will agree to disagree. One person's stands-out-nicely is another person's
annoying distraction.

> However the color difference must be small otherwise the text with a
> background color will perhaps stand out to much. I think there is a
> balance between standing out too much or too little.
> 
> In what way do you think it distracting?

See above.

> > Also, they look odd when over trailing whitespace.
> 
> I see no visual problem there. Can you tell me what you see?

It won't convince you, but even without trailing whitespace, I find large chunks
of faces with fg and bg to look odd against the page background. It's like
putting boxes around each line of text. If it looks good to you, fine. Just one
opinion.

A face that has the same background (i.e. no background) as the page looks like
text on the page. A face that has no foreground looks like highlighting. Both
are good.

A face that has a foreground and a background that is different from the page
looks like a boxed heading. And a chunk of such text doesn't look like a
rectangular text box. It looks like a set of Lego blocks, with varying right
edges due to different line lengths.

FWIW. 





  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-03 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-30 21:12 Darkening font-lock colors Chong Yidong
2009-07-30 21:39 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-07-30 21:51   ` Drew Adams
2009-07-30 22:00     ` Chong Yidong
2009-07-30 21:57   ` Chong Yidong
2009-07-30 22:21     ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-07-30 23:40       ` David De La Harpe Golden
2009-07-31  0:18         ` Lennart Borgman
2009-07-31  0:55           ` Chong Yidong
2009-07-31  3:01             ` Lennart Borgman
2009-07-31 15:39               ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-02 20:22               ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-02 22:36                 ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-02 22:40                   ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-03  0:16                   ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-03  1:09                     ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10  0:14                       ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-10  2:37                         ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-10  3:28                           ` Miles Bader
2009-08-10 23:56                             ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-03  2:14                     ` David De La Harpe Golden
2009-08-03  2:28                       ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-03  4:34                         ` David De La Harpe Golden
2009-08-03  5:13                         ` Miles Bader
2009-08-03  5:22                           ` Drew Adams
2009-08-03  9:54                             ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-03 11:58                               ` Daniel Clemente
2009-08-03 13:49                               ` Drew Adams
2009-08-03 23:32                                 ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-03 23:46                                   ` Drew Adams
2009-08-03 13:59                               ` joakim
2009-08-03 20:42                                 ` David De La Harpe Golden
2009-08-08 20:56                                 ` Color themes (was: Darkening font-lock colors) Juri Linkov
2009-08-08 21:16                                   ` Color themes joakim
2009-08-09  3:04                                   ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-09  4:28                                     ` Leo
2009-08-09 16:18                                       ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-09 17:28                                         ` CHENG Gao
2009-08-09 18:05                                         ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 18:51                                         ` joakim
2009-08-10  9:12                                         ` Leo
2009-08-10 23:48                                           ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-11  1:32                                             ` Leo
2009-08-11  3:58                                           ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-11  4:26                                             ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-11  5:52                                               ` Drew Adams
2009-08-11  5:52                                             ` Drew Adams
2009-08-11  8:59                                             ` Leo
2009-08-11 18:21                                               ` ferkiwi
2009-08-03 20:01                           ` Darkening font-lock colors Lennart Borgman
2009-08-03 22:40                             ` Drew Adams
2009-08-03 22:57                               ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-03 23:54                                 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2009-08-04  0:10                                   ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-04  0:16                                     ` Drew Adams
2009-08-04 21:27                                     ` Johan Bockgård
2009-08-04 23:16                                       ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-03 23:27                         ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-03 23:42                           ` Lennart Borgman
2009-07-31  0:55       ` Chong Yidong
2009-07-31  2:39         ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-03  0:17           ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-03  3:44             ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-03  9:59               ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-03 12:34                 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-03 14:21                   ` Stephen Eilert
2009-08-03 21:11                   ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-03 23:02                     ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-04  8:27                       ` Romain Francoise
2009-08-04  8:29                         ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-04 22:44                         ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-03 23:32                   ` Juri Linkov
2009-07-31  0:46   ` Lennart Borgman
2009-07-30 21:41 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-07-30 22:22 ` Deniz Dogan
2009-07-31  1:50   ` Stefan Monnier
2009-07-31  3:54 ` tomas
2009-08-04 22:14 ` Juri Linkov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-03  9:35 Angelo Graziosi
2009-08-03 20:42 Francesc Rocher
2009-08-04  0:16 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-04  0:21 ` Drew Adams
2009-08-10 14:15 grischka
2009-08-10 23:57 ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-11 16:07   ` grischka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5908857581A447C3865D9DD2BA70BA16@us.oracle.com \
    --to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
    --cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    --cc=dann@ics.uci.edu \
    --cc=david@harpegolden.net \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@jurta.org \
    --cc=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
    --cc=miles@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).