unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Ami Fischman <ami@fischman.org>,
	 "emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: display-buffer vs. current-buffer vs. post-command-hook
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:07:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57F3D3B6.7080201@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGKqTXUSk+RjdY0x5s=+n6gaKdLM2WRj6N2Oxw+yB0+FYBDSqA@mail.gmail.com>

 > I'm sorry but I don't understand your statement.  Should there not be an
 > expectation that (current-buffer)'s return value does not change between
 > the second and third call in my original snippet?

No.  The primary concern is that the current buffer must not be changed
by `describe-key' or any other function that uses a temporary buffer to
display its results.

 > Put another way, under what circumstances should one expect
 > current-buffer's return value to be stable in user-written elisp?

The current buffer should never be changed by any function, unless it is
a purpose of that function to change the current buffer.

 > Put a third way, what about describe-keys documentation should lead an
 > elisp author to understand that current-buffer will not reflect its effect
 > until after a [run-at-time 0]?
 > (sorry for the barrage of questions; I feel there's a fundamental something
 > I'm missing in play here and trying to see if you know what it is :))

I suppose you missed the following aspect described in section 26.2 of
the Elisp manual entitled "The Current Buffer":

   When an editing command returns to the editor command loop, Emacs
   automatically calls `set-buffer' on the buffer shown in the selected
   window.

[run-at-time 0] clearly runs after that.

martin



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-04 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-04  9:28 display-buffer vs. current-buffer vs. post-command-hook Ami Fischman
2016-10-04 12:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-04 14:52 ` martin rudalics
2016-10-04 15:45   ` Ami Fischman
2016-10-04 15:49     ` Ami Fischman
2016-10-04 16:07     ` martin rudalics [this message]
2016-10-04 20:03       ` Ami Fischman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57F3D3B6.7080201@gmx.at \
    --to=rudalics@gmx.at \
    --cc=ami@fischman.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).