From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About the 'minibuffer' frame parameter Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:01:20 +0200 Message-ID: <57BB21D0.6070601@gmx.at> References: <579E3F9E.8020200@gmx.at> <83h9azl4s1.fsf@gnu.org> <57A4C0DE.3060506@gmx.at> <837fbvkofs.fsf@gnu.org> <57A5AF03.30807@gmx.at> <8360rck7kd.fsf@gnu.org> <57A84256.8030706@gmx.at> <83popji89w.fsf@gnu.org> <57A9940B.6030005@gmx.at> <8337mehu5u.fsf@gnu.org> <57A9FFDE.10106@gmx.at> <83pophhq1a.fsf@gnu.org> <57AA141C.5010701@gmx.at> <83mvklhluf.fsf@gnu.org> <57AB1AF1.2010205@gmx.at> <837fbohe5u.fsf@gnu.org> <57B97734.1090302@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471881826 8519 195.159.176.226 (22 Aug 2016 16:03:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kaushal Modi , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 22 18:03:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbrhN-0001t9-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:03:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42162 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbrhJ-0005sv-Sp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbrfM-00046O-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:01:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbrfH-0007kA-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:54806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbrfH-0007jm-G2; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.7]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcmN9-1auFah1xmZ-00k6wG; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:01:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8L5TQD6RCDecqTXPqTGoR0fxEJTissCWMkm1faMhtvXWODnnm/m mbuSAHXw92Nacw9v88TW5G+6N39H9mNnHbd6jEYn/yVVvbzbNvp3NpqSAD6q/lf2VQwa+C3 aPM1t/niL4DlzJ7LwuyMzaeAgtC9i40N2+pGkdcMo3eDzkygyxnOjMyL3qcAivMlAj4jOEA 4r9NBJ8dtCKmkj27XyhXQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Le6wEmJo1l4=:irU/rbCEyKxxDoCyYwB3gU dlJJgVLtqByYU6cS3MFl2PIV1FXKs7lW4gEnavSOWKgmz4Mjp61Q57UQF3rcKWsIlgjJaFXoD uxbn0JG7alX0NpMUxHFayKbqaTofTo7YlPMiK+yuUEfm3qD9IUMNjeb5HHQw84aBAna9r04sq KEzvH4NR5vSXi+RHfZHtN4J6hRXqX2vkJM69vcEXT2MKw7fdeGYMV/HpGwphMdxRPgmiSTuRF yJH1Vb4HFF0V5bCmHtcxYDSGd/gyjGcz7MFlfrhEhtuNIirc6KQI34kDSF333S5cl7Il6qiJV bQGabV1L16mMJ31t+U57HGwssiuTBvAyDj8Uzy2Xez9OvHBIvKo8yZDkaxcI8heyxXc6qVJBn t5b2Oq5k/P4Y28bC0y/70H3WvZmZaYpU44Lx3wsFhkpJc/yfyEx+rA/ibRuj96LMFiL5dCVur Qr+5TNFRBJ5UWq1OCTeWEhRG9ZKs/gtYJEJof/B00We6jBTjUXo7DOjG99XI4J4JEUPmSZXNX wgNvlfPVwjHbUK3trpo3xoDYSziMmo+KShL/IwfOI5CNPwpQSpT2ba+BB+/R3VIb3PIXOGQWI GKuTVfo7wUm3amu8KuIRYMsJG+vgD6ahjTGQxZ7FXzgR+gFVN1PFUeRpfZzhKro3dKqYAjJ1O q0I+pfz2iGlTpuVGxBRb/2kDl27kGFaEJU9+st++kXsF7DG8oyf8W1jZWyF92Yn/LaZXOMPFE 7+LnEN6JyasgJUQHpLATMjncd3cCRDJJP0gvBa8qZPYxsDYfpK1PoENI0mEiRHHfUcz5C4tn X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206755 Archived-At: > Actually, it seems like one of the existing windows gets cloned and th= at is > put on top of the minibuffer without modeline. > > It looks something like this. > > So the minibuffer looks completely fused with Win 2 of Buf x (that som= ehow > got created automatically when I enabled debug-on-error). > After some window switching, the mode line for Win 2 appears automatic= ally. > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > | Win 1 - Buf x | > ---------------------------------------------- > | Mode-line for Win 1 | > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > | Win 2 - Buf x | > ---------------------------------------------- > | Minibuffer | > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > (I put to white box there to mask my work stuff. If I close that windo= w, You mean "If I delete Win 1"? > the missing modeline for the bottom "Win 2 - Buf x" is created > automatically. And what else do you see now in Win 2 besides the "- Searchd" string? > Note that the same "-Searchd" string is shown in the actual > window on the top right and the bottom window auto-created exactly abo= ve > the minibuffer (so I thought earlier that the minibuffer had 2 rows; i= t was > in fact an inactive window and thus that inactive window cursor face).= In any case please do (window--dump-frame) for that frame - the result of that dump is in a buffer called *window-frame-dump* and post the result here. I think that the appearance of that one line window is more or less intentional but I have no idea who's responsible for it. At least that someone seems to do very tricky things to your window layout ;-) > Please ignore that.. that bug is there but has nothing to do with your= > recent commit. > I see it on emacs 25.1 RC2 too when I end up causing a timer error in > pdf-tools package: I'd still want to see the output of =E2=80=98window--dump-frame=E2=80=99 = for this frame (no fear - it doesn't reveal any buffer contents). martin