From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Note on e65c307 breaks font-height Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 10:00:19 +0200 Message-ID: <574BF313.2060305@gmx.at> References: <5746D38F.4010203@gmx.at> <4cdc1b55-2fe2-2457-1115-33ff68a9a65d@cs.ucla.edu> <5748490A.6020906@gmx.at> <57497527.8050600@cs.ucla.edu> <574AF21D.30602@gmx.at> <574B2360.7070809@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464595386 31878 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2016 08:03:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 08:03:06 +0000 (UTC) To: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 30 10:02:58 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b7IA5-0003x1-Om for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 10:02:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7IA4-0005UD-P9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 04:02:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7I7s-0004Xm-Tn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 04:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7I7n-00024j-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 04:00:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:49505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7I7n-00024S-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 04:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.113]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LztD9-1bb0K92MmB-0155oY; Mon, 30 May 2016 10:00:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <574B2360.7070809@cs.ucla.edu> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WEvxIB4D1eBNPKrLr8v55AVX9Ged5eUfnPf73PLOLzn40GGNsCT DM9az2TZAo2J1KxFdAVCw6oi3AodoXue684orMOdB8zR4fF1Y1jju2JdJ6jgyPlSk4nxWlj ZArV8SZ5YRCxhXDBedgnh3bPhYAPEct0ew3MaX5JKFTYFRgBbGU4AJP03x+BwQCvYsVg4lh 2zmh6Yl/MK+L3f9VgRTYQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fPdsfs2Ir+o=:JL1tgdGCAG90wJFHV+nnG1 24dkWB74M8NUAx6hQ81IxpWgQ/5OuiJ8xN5lVWWJSvCSbW8f9ejOjD6qJ6enWOLP3IlyFuUC8 5S4LibxqtcYvmM5J7wO/mBSqheIDwPMBuRVUTEILHuA/hgDxAYM8HNnFqptJo6TLUvCWs0ZQU W7omRQua3shN0b89XWW4t9U19SEqt+21YtnJqQCsW/tsgDWIbjqngf+4gF6d6vmedycg60toe G6N0AlDTKlNIrCidBU3cBrJxPBW8uKPTcJaS76IduCCg5qTnw5uIeEbxj5VqGOMFh22ilTJci CG3zDuG4nbK50WLxvgaUI2y7oDq2ZHr6VqPPahJp0quTmvFTQ833yBAO6xT6Mtkjs8XbMUDI6 Y3HrnEu1Rw+jS5K3NPCcGrRmR7j/JDC8toAXIa5cXM3x9RMa3Nq19gVSz1hY/IA3a35WDRxWr xohOnaEXVrMYWQ7ERKXivRmkH7dYGvA1WmP0XxIsp3QcKkTtmlHu+ICvN2ks9ja0PlqxG73zF jwszVeTESgntd+BAlNn9EuVJFoexHBlV7Y3PcW21jYs95oFH7vpG4ETxf77CpdAJqyIjs8PP0 fxxwOhGEe5dkPxayUUZuUbbCANUNRrPVJWM43X19YPXkWoj4vileXOaR9nmMnoxpCj+re3TEd Msm53yZMTCgSNLgpxCIixIVzBUn4hDnVpUw/fDlWbLxCYep+KEJCN+IM6rO5vH/9lclBbg6Sl liskm/oJb7AQc6wsAHwFW5MBhRukucHmM5I9ItUq59G+1P5PrCTG9wiU+TlE9uVrgb4NAX3C X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204144 Archived-At: >> I have no idea what the --eval is for. > > I put that --eval in only because Rostislav Svoboda's bug report menti= oned it and I thought that it was needed to reproduce the bug. Aha. It's not needed here. >> > And in both Emacs 24.5 and emacs-25 if I reapply .emacs the >> > display changes to the same (nicer) appearance. >> >> But in Emacs 25 I have to _manually_ reapply .emacs. > > Yes, that is annoying. But I had to manually reapply .emacs in Emacs 2= 4.5 too, with the scenario involving --eval. So this was not a regression= for me in that case, which means I haven't reproduced your bug yet.... I see. >> dynamic-setting-handle-config-changed-event: Symbol=E2=80=99s value a= s variable is void: >> default-face-font-user-spec > > Ach, that was a stupid last-minute typo. Revised patch attached. In this case the behavior is unchanged. This is expected since the problematic call is =E2=80=98set-face-attribute=E2=80=99 (as you can see = from the backtraces I sent) and your patch doesn't inhibit that. martin