From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 08:11:28 -0400 Message-ID: <572C89F0.8050305@gmail.com> References: <20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VGH6AngGCi0aipCRPwW9sul6k7s0AIgcn" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462536753 2885 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2016 12:12:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 12:12:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 14:12:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ayecJ-0007eD-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 14:12:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayecF-0007z0-RM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 08:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayebv-0007lF-Vy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 08:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayebj-0005Yc-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 08:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:54374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayebj-0005Rz-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 08:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.189.83.142] ([18.189.83.142]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LtnUL-1bfnIC1GJJ-011F1W for ; Fri, 06 May 2016 14:11:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2QjEhHemf3wupkPMppYNwKiDbeaZSioKgKi7myFhLMfVpRkpJFg JSAL2+TiRInGpZ2mRXPakhQZIJTvB8ON0skHKRwqhynty+6QJNYLlm3c0foxrZS0yBOKgVL sqPSxF8mSvZzEWsg/brsLjTZP9JzHG+qjYSwGxIbTV5hQ2zpfUSqChBrSqkgVsJmF4XZQ8M gFGVfWuvyY9EYI7SBEfdw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:GAgrlZUPs10=:Pv6KCrzBjJBuBn3Hw9J9um WHHTFeJhfFfLDkqGa7oTkMuQI102O8x3thEnJBBBATkSVwYfYlYKpuIKZ30NC6stJ7oGQpC4y J9dxBuiJcslDdpS2cuBkTn3nLT1Xc5sJL8yp0jWzdihixIgQJiFcSdnehcZzAgeHRfInMsis5 gi6qFdfbyLeDMKrua52MWM2qb1ns2dRzpC3NxtPb0EVopeKFSA5FscKuWBanqr8Ljoxr0VCWi cNNyXQ9BjS2Ec9uxKK5tKzaCSc8QJFGOGgIwzNf5LiU3DXSvFie11nViFasBV62KHv+ZJGPAt iHwW8D+k1Eonk8rt+QEy0QODOFNzzlnhVs+Xrb8L8MQSuMx1vbOb/MqnQ5oijqqPO00FlsZsA 3UAUTDGQR4Ed1IuiQOU+5e8h4zN/qBABm0C6uSNqeXxCP72T7lE3ZBe/s9BeG0CHF6kipLOqm ZuWubmH5etASEv0Gieqnvs2U/E5tZh9eLbwpvtsNvgPfBbmIzemnR7v7SHvxm2qDRtFiPqWa0 E0B1s6bbTcROGmbesCaiy2T6coHLnLJtcvRFjPMDO15sXawdVw+Ssnv63Y7yC0NApItyEIDT0 ESsUXooAf1S09lOlHMT2Doo0nmmsHmSwG670/mSuhLBOKKeNQ2HaWCD6Z1kmnuUrVxzvaJWQj zfOepThityEhigHuhCxrRBPpi6l9MwrpLdCbvUWiGCe3SBoo9eRUw1Hu9x+6qYKC573c= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.74 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203639 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VGH6AngGCi0aipCRPwW9sul6k7s0AIgcn Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="IEo3KE7oiXMDFXjxduXpnhBHQAfKpDVdt" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <572C89F0.8050305@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command References: <20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: --IEo3KE7oiXMDFXjxduXpnhBHQAfKpDVdt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-05-06 06:52, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > Might be hard to implement, though, as it's not clear how > to compare old and new definitions to decide where to move > breakpoints. Although if breakpoints are shown as overlays as you suggested the new po= sition of these overlays could help, maybe? --IEo3KE7oiXMDFXjxduXpnhBHQAfKpDVdt-- --VGH6AngGCi0aipCRPwW9sul6k7s0AIgcn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXLInwAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjankP/1fY13NczQTpmYhkc1VKlQG/ 6tt1x0x84qqctxFUL9HrfpEiBWwYG7uP8ort+bY8/3ov/imABHNzZjhLi3RsMEX4 XzSaZI8CQIBJ8wx4uX812RAyOk2frnbWDhSzfriTcSRsMWulXXk44hWzhEQEI19D 5w1eCCZEX1OfNCDp7QRWGTQAu/q4U+wOSgJIxNIUGC4Bs3wE2z40MpNXwediVDHa tcNQpA/K4Klf+tT3Qatr1E1RXpFxGN8dCpguzeMNt5jFw0sxw9uIkijtP6C+xAYY yWr5+IqG3XWVm8fBXrJRKNy1r8/EVrgaOBaRuz8LoiCTpR43dwHVToyVu7pV4Z+o YE6kfJJNf7zcraZDrozEiXPtGIdi7bfkuflwBio1awztAs0Dj0jg3WoE6Ja3Uf4d QzTcdQdCzHcCQWueyTxW7N5oCGiFULEB7ChP9y9T2MynDRqrawqXz1W0oxC6RIjB pbgIBeujCTXKJCkd1xPG/IMJ5P/nQzxYyUqv6lMUxTYF4pEd6eS8sUuZPhLwd3Sz USLush8AcvPFGqPgery1g3wDFv/VOfTwvNryi1sCWrB4ePgJzk+gP/mfPe4iHV0V W7oKlUM5C7fIzvkZMPVuDb0zLOw6fSewmWS8hYEcR093dkux+YVkpp03s4iuM7bY vYJ2rX3sZtM90/pnMwqB =+1ZJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VGH6AngGCi0aipCRPwW9sul6k7s0AIgcn--