From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs on MSYS2 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:15:16 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <57113DC4.4010303@cs.ucla.edu> References: <56CCD91E.6070507@alice.it> <56DA0327.2030009@alice.it> <83oaatxu72.fsf@gnu.org> <570C4307.6050907@alice.it> <83k2k2g82s.fsf@gnu.org> <570EA823.1010404@alice.it> <570EBADD.2060604@cs.ucla.edu> <570EC198.5090407@alice.it> <570EF300.3050104@cs.ucla.edu> <570F4EC7.3060403@alice.it> <83twj4dx7q.fsf@gnu.org> <878u0gyyge.fsf_-_@wanadoo.es> <570FC0BC.8030709@cs.ucla.edu> <874mb4yxqi.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83potsduv5.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb3kxho5.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83mvowdru7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3e8x88h.fsf@wanadoo.es> <571102B8.8010004@cs.ucla.edu> <87inziyjb5.fsf@wanadoo.es> <57112544.5050508@cs.ucla.edu> <87d1pqycsz.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460747771 8024 80.91.229.3 (15 Apr 2016 19:16:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:16:11 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 15 21:16:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ar9Di-0003U6-NZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:15:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ar9Dh-0002hu-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ar9DB-0002e8-26 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ar9D7-0004Py-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:51248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ar9D6-0004OR-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:15:21 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB00116124C; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ZQILwmaLaAk1; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45426161258; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id pJEXCDUUiqni; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EBF216124C; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 In-Reply-To: <87d1pqycsz.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202966 Archived-At: On 04/15/2016 10:58 AM, =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > Which is irrelevant for the user who builds Emacs, isn't it? Yes, and this supports Eli's point. Generally speaking, it's better to=20 keep the MSYS2 build simple so that it tracks mainline Emacs=20 development. In particular, the --with-wide-int settings of the MSYS2=20 build are irrelevant to the user who builds Emacs, so they should be=20 omitted.