From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el? Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:36:19 -0400 Message-ID: <570AB943.4060604@gmail.com> References: <56F42269.10400@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8PeWqDjRTCtq12tr3EhmcNHUMd0cqJ9h5" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460320597 18120 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2016 20:36:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org, Vibhav Pant Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 10 22:36:36 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1apM5x-0001Sb-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:36:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apM5w-0008IZ-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apM5s-0008Fp-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:36:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apM5m-00076J-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:57273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apM5m-00076F-5E; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:36:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.189.83.142] ([18.189.83.142]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3O8y-1bg5Eh2VHs-00r1mX; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:36:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NrSzFinbXKAiI//Mno+itGefpcbYW+N+hfeGy1cGLlY0Jn68gCI NxqnnpQ2UpPIU1FYkc9bVO8PLSyOlM5Wl1Mtb04BQRKCvGLa5P0NqhupsT0uS78U5i2OOXc OsycqhU1WfqMiXOLH9qXY2wEQelTNx+j5QZ512XRFVj6Nr36f0wEfmSsSBP7w6BnscakHxu IKAku5edoL8iLvz0cIBPw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:NsQoOLhz7bU=:E5SGq1ura4ctxlOViCqo5G C4dWrbjVH2gC3DwFXRKBcuH057BMtyR5d8T2ZlDiiK++ioolxH2jObjegnIjXOt5b7R7zLLFQ 3VbFmTZUnCp9fbTU7bbVhvt+o1/NXW/qVhk2i9tVcoDNVtDp0hoA+mvhL18jbz7VIJc7VhGS4 1tjS4C/EelfWOHalx7VHth8uY6hyUsYSblqO0YXAYgo6UOu+0JIxmUz72bUh9sjLd/m4DoBPI W9coqTZK99Iu4wixZU/pPW0N8A74Q2bjR3lKR4356B9kjlcEO2v7EIGaofAX6tXJWij0gqoXW eE+B4X+NBe9CaDs5Uk3NfgT7u4GWo83XlI6T7xw+SbFtam5Li0/5FMSaYKuor6a1tW9QBCGsl yWCo6jdto5UuOk4bbwQ8E1/S0MbRlowwcdQ+ZiK4CIA0x+WWh+AqaxMU/hypQtaFrGdZ4C/AE EuEWQ0wDYBC7aUWGGztPuLwHn5dWlZIS+xrJ/LL2c25kYiFf77RPbIsDXAP/+Pw79O+T2nbn1 GsoKjx3ZFk/BWYfn4I61v5oTh87dKuf5NDO87HpEKKcoF25ztH2CAOERO7VkFXSepmiMU60Se 5EgH2NEjgXCo8X4gr5HQD647aauz14TdMzRe5rCS644EshOHJ2UXOraVmsoZpGYrwdFcKIOSr eNa7buwedlQIM5LVnQ8dpfyM4WBY8uTwHM5K0Ii3+sRhLyLThLJx2QM1ySLEG8PmEJiA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.131 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202843 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8PeWqDjRTCtq12tr3EhmcNHUMd0cqJ9h5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TX1kavG08I806CH9J44LITAdkOiGcc4bC" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: rms@gnu.org, Vibhav Pant Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <570AB943.4060604@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el? References: <56F42269.10400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: --TX1kavG08I806CH9J44LITAdkOiGcc4bC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/10/2016 03:01 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > IRC and web browsing are different activities and raise different > issues regarding surveillance. There is no reason to insist a priori > on treating them alike. Similarly, package retrieval and web browsing are different activities an= d raise different issues; hence my question about the specific case of pa= ckage.el. Richard, are you familiar with the url-privacy-level variable? Cl=C3=A9ment. --TX1kavG08I806CH9J44LITAdkOiGcc4bC-- --8PeWqDjRTCtq12tr3EhmcNHUMd0cqJ9h5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXCrlDAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjSj4P/imrz2oMpo/3ecdpYYssTVVW hp/26LOB87lt9UjGNHnXOMx1cG2OcdmJ5gD4ocdf9G3Vg+SbW7NWPyjbUY1O3DQ1 89FXGSO/6RVEyJXVof5BHaBlGMCEh9auCJAVepdhAvlW2gxRXIjxlxujDsT6z2wl 6wRW3tDmjwMZXOPXvI0Kt0T96dwe/xBAHNp9BHdY+bJXpww/Va0IT8fyryXi8rMD MZ05XznRAiaYxZgwoRbXpbswGU3E2+E5NHkJqkSGAiVR6ZaJuFEBdK/X9UFqj7Ud 1BURAWNRPvh+FPMcFFYOFdMSFh/oA/GB4+hwZdJRf7weVd+9yZlJQI9/nmdRSMBo ImptcKrt1fOprPuKM65K81z+KBhZn0uEVGXnkNOvHTdl4VnTsW8/MiLWh9yZap0G f/zscR8O+RIcYi6L60IS/FwJmG4F4WAHWB97VMept8Y/vtw22hfmj52yZAyefCEm RUFutaEiHdClTMGuurwogbVw6pOylqDCYv/5BFih/z8hMkgsr7ULKbv45P3QsF9R zwKwunBfWxOHdzcFnUUGaO1NrhaDEIyeWPGrKF29FAdmkx4PqBQnw6Rh2D3bFEle ImF5zNVy1qYr3M0IkAzh18FsoJz3tFgwE5iu6gyACt6AePVBbwLbBt/AUOrHGXVu kxBbQRaOPL/u2La42m8z =6div -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8PeWqDjRTCtq12tr3EhmcNHUMd0cqJ9h5--