On 03/07/2016 04:29 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> >> Of course I'm addressing the problem: ditch changelogs, require quality >>> >> log messages and put to good use our VC tool. >> > >> > Requiring something that is not enforceable, with mistakes that >> > cannot be corrected, > Introduce code reviews. Don't give commit access to the "golden" > branches to everyone, just to a few top contributors and reviewers. Wouldn't that be a very big change in the way Emacs development works, much bigger than deciding for or against Changelogs?