From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What to do when font-lock-flush + font-lock-ensure do less than font-lock-fontify-buffer? Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:29:10 -0500 Message-ID: <56CB3756.6000906@gmail.com> References: <56CA94A8.3000205@gmail.com> <83si0klo3c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wANWr7A5TdIMXS0QTt43OvEKE3q7oNTPN" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456158571 29338 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2016 16:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 17:29:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXtMP-0003mI-Gu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:29:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXtMO-0002R8-PT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:29:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXtMK-0002Qk-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:29:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXtMH-0003HF-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:65362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXtMG-0003HB-SO; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.189.69.235] ([18.189.69.235]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfE46-1aI0693jeE-00Oou1; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:29:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: <83si0klo3c.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:q9BMlAPhePrJlX72NSz6z4b7TDGwevstsGDW9Nj6LyAlVCwV9sY qtCNc2MqnTefYS7QshPzZIdnKfvIlv8HpnUDavbxuePl8YSjF0dwkb09oVFgAIuHenZbt+F kUymJqhZsQq+dcN88kMqRmXUyvOu9AAIvN8U/Mwsl2s2jqbgnW5OmlgOQGg1ltzrInNm6lW bvZTn3JmoeopduDH2BkRg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:d7lcYDpwtwQ=:Qc1CdywrbLdJ/1FSgbBp/K A05EOLBAtPcnXTbAyaaHpknL2qErKfuUEo1tftVU/RBwNojLTW8qqqB46saPo7YDmiVR+MXu6 5wkC0XqNrp5oz3ZdgEyequs4ti6rP6Wvgrbc5lgeFjMWPIbuSASak3HPJEL7LNZ8gLUFUMRUS gc7hD3Q1ZE+2cEnq8QrSXEDa5BNpmdkKqwFToG0C3zYkK+jRsrAw02LYzZ+eiKELPcqcRkN1b g7yGMOc3SsNNdeNv4imQEwXL+/MI5RZUY5Dm/omX0CYr0YM2Np54HoUivqfO+FDzaf/bQpGgP T1PYDqRMS9bVjDnv3+bzELV1/M63BQ3BuEiDXNkYabhLvo6Vh0e4/qSx6REu25/e3kmyWt7iu ndAcjyMbvweFItACgTC5fJPY3PYClDKM7yWrnM8S+sPtITA4C6kve8szayJ4QeUdAIHgjvNq5 nhZXbhkUoeS98Qt1ftgVhCJkxcl7u5gSeubESVYc/aZQ5O1aVfU1iTUohSgsGLy5iQkAez6+2 Iqohm81gDigybmop8qYNJTUVclI5tCiHhhhcihbeiYYjA/3fVTnx5G0e4N6TeU/F0rvzI33se Cy+MFYNJuV5hXQBuivN7ieKAs1u/7UCaZ8x72n8/g/4RIpiBx0VayLRDpC2/r/KRhoHATqTBs 87NeD4DlTkB3zm8m4591hL1qEzhpLvZaqNdssH/OUaAM9CAas5OqCeHssAxFibOHV9JQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.130 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200461 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --wANWr7A5TdIMXS0QTt43OvEKE3q7oNTPN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/22/2016 11:13 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel >> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:55:04 -0500 >> >> IIUC the proper way in Emacs 25 to signal changes that require a refon= tification to font-lock is to call font-lock-flush. This doesn't always d= o as much as font-lock-fontify-buffer does, though. >> >> In particular, when the font-lock-fontified variable is nil (which doe= s happen, though I don't know why; I don't know what this variable is for= ), then calling font-lock-fontify buffer does refontify the whole buffer,= but font-lock-flush and font-lock-ensure don't seem to do anything. >> >> What's the proper way to mark a buffer for refontification (and refont= ify the visible portion) immediately in 25? >=20 > I think what you describe _is_ the proper way. Can you show a test > case which demonstrates how calling font-lock-flush followed by > font-lock-ensure fails to do the job? In any case where font-lock-fontified is nil font-lock-fontify-buffer wil= l properly refontify the whole buffer, but font-lock-flush and font-lock = ensure will not do anything. I don't know what causes that variable to be= nil in the first place, though. Cl=C3=A9ment. --wANWr7A5TdIMXS0QTt43OvEKE3q7oNTPN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWyzdWAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjENEQALX9PPHi2wd6/1QUJHjDeMBI bwUcn2bnUkKxoWy60WHU/tFFRrAWkMqWAKnd+3sTGF4m9STpy2AMrL4WtZxtOrz2 od8ihV2pYRffQJ0NigAVc8pheNIesrdjEntDW2px1ZXANH2vnXCOJiKoXTKoe871 j/MzbtiVzFJBIhDQCXuKXuzfNAW8DuORPlsrdaqK2cfq9XiI/W4/reN77eu1PsbL bpuTsmehXfNxB1X9/H0RoBnhAsO+BEDTyrslggZbe10n0Q4i3sAcHhW70gUiICLV xDa6FiV2Z6WsxPmkyV4TvNpL4DjUB75pfQCLZrLpU5mu6P0cEVyyS+heWf5bAeuW chub8K6LvZbDRDjzCZCbD57vto9mlUAXlgfjFa3weQFeWvksAa17pRFv5mT6ffV/ XR+BbF0lkB9JdX8l2lE3642Jk8h/2wwCwnGCCUleNgQMjqbrwL0Y80qexHzbhuGb ba3mgIk66YKgjnqBsTDgiJbWh3U4tRIqdXYIiaDmR34phqfm2TK+fgKG38qPsluS BEziqTiVsS3BA2Eg/KQwedYs4FoRk8mCONUveHG//e2TkxeqaPnBusTxQPVJnLOo PKYB5Y7VzG2qXjOkxQLekVBGlx7J1044Iy5Sf2sZJF3z6I6THutZG3cOMfs5xj+R Sd4dH6Z3KVa1xIW4ENz+ =dGBh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wANWr7A5TdIMXS0QTt43OvEKE3q7oNTPN--