From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering Unicode characters Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 13:42:34 -0500 Message-ID: <56B7901A.6080700@gmail.com> References: <83twmkkv16.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibx8XSESasOrnkCGbUD2uv9csILKGeL9P" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454870577 22837 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2016 18:42:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 18:42:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 07 19:42:49 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSUII-0003x8-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:42:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37144 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSUIH-0007KE-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:42:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSUID-0007It-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:42:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSUIA-0007Fv-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:57275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSUI9-0007Fd-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:42:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.189.87.242] ([18.189.87.242]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHYCK-1aTbHc1ipA-003KVD for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:42:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:/UmaAzpRWcdQjs0gK2SG3QED2GyO26O7qyISKwY4CihR+faDhXx cPiqGOlyiHarWjAACqV88ZSKEKNpTQNYrh25G58R66Q9Kb+7XM9bJOhzLhBXe4I54S/Kvnk apGBH/yNBltVww7xoKYNUDzw6wXjoR/w8nYqZPmDXiEkpYOqwCfRsrbzNlmBKPyssfxBKTO 49T5t1PfwhtCKurqRUcnw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:oCqhJj/VWH4=:Y/gmDYTdRRrjWbTdGwl7pp 65rKAcYNUfpcOK0Gl6yRPBLK5+TEiOdyO3SxsRM29irlfDfR3loS5FyE3KHlSO0Z0ESk1Impx qN/SgTIT8SodSpQxd47NNnJi6jV2YqxA5Vy/XYO94pqVCMrRrNXozKhShwLgKCmXHtMviKWSE O5hm4Ky03YNwqAzAOTI3/fN0FIkaSn4ifUCebsx+g6amchuATwE6AXBpwkLcSbtRYJ3o0khv0 ey9OAaOd1cpEnmkcq1V+B2cv1n45BSc6fi9HYdfQs4D8Q4niF/AU8aF0OQNEeWPy182bVsa8n QM2TtI0XKvoqNxpKrE+myZ2nQa1bRswnZjCeLxILUd7ASwt7ZTy64qOd8X5IjYeLIW70sN11C tPfa+fSuPpcsn0VwUBzLPIR665unZhmhdMh1J6CFs0nEHP4nSqa7ak5LWeAv0pcjvMqUFJRTg PFuLEsQQWoUV667fzM0PsL9+o0Dgq8BRfmyapDhiSdDyhatsgMJTr48ymllng0y5jK+Rdmy52 uyFLb1zIiaVBUY7yg/rs2WNQUVuNtO16MOt5svZBK/BoMMxlrIPqXTUvzfjVqqJfNiZVJD2C0 Pwnq+ta4gRD01eZdPCpvRbCgKbLu07Xn9xa91BGoswJTTaTb0YoMGQyWk19+FyyWQYBGW3+vP a7yD4v91kO6Y9bjwq/Uh87CjTbyy8/E98oF07U5NCrzg5iZhaf2razKVvzPG15XcrS1E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.74 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199456 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ibx8XSESasOrnkCGbUD2uv9csILKGeL9P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/07/2016 01:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > Many of the characters don't display on my console, > Have we got a way to tell, in Emacs Lisp, whether a certain > character code can actually display? I think there is one. Do we? That would be wonderful! But I don't think we do, unfortunately. --ibx8XSESasOrnkCGbUD2uv9csILKGeL9P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWt5AbAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjW6sP/36I+C86glNXipaf0bQGp05f 1x7a71P47N3XPPSv3GtJ6ATVGFnpovTPsmGMqRbICD8An4bxte3TlBI5VVJ82Yes NmbfkCB2IBp0CIjdEHH7j0fgSWNgTPcFEGOIV9vljRTDuKB62jXtSv48+hKH0V/3 vh9D0f7uKM0DHcYyhJOWI1WaGSLK1pyOf9lw2ym4tyuO4mJqGC+rpdL/jFjMeqj4 /vBxL6bFSMazmt1u3rsTEq+el0XE66RA/+X/OiNApOXJWApUy3dX69LAogFAmwc8 czkF2+Bg2PZfHrJAJnfgna+Oq7sTNvfdFxELLDeFbCzDVbW33A8ATxEBKAmwLvCG VLZmhCMneQ/zCRltW+rwd99aqCjcNRFi3/5EHxsHt+UfblDBu/QzgkxCd1Swhq07 XqpIuMhT9k0j1P6mkvMAHwdrIo7eOlUHIE/x8Y9VWMV2Jgfbci0d4b+MVxdq6vo/ RRpCUcU70nwVi215cuI0c7Peq9aQGHRV85epVZA7rIKUjcpj4dZzMos0sLhZI8q0 aqLvpTMC7KDhQdAq4ejELUZjqlHfIP/yXjl5nvj9pma68ty81jxKUepH3hqI8X3G yrJULYeS+pAaSwrgLmsGZuFAAQm2Wuj4BkTlwNao5u6vkkKvCu7j5JGjPiWGwHOw 3I1rBua1WdMR+sPT3P+U =o1YA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibx8XSESasOrnkCGbUD2uv9csILKGeL9P--