From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: find-file-project Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:50:25 +0300 Message-ID: <56A00F31.7050108@yandex.ru> References: <86pp1j4ejm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F899EA.7050700@yandex.ru> <86lhc73wog.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F8F2FA.6060902@yandex.ru> <867fnq1oe9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F9A13A.3070101@yandex.ru> <55FB01BD.1070909@yandex.ru> <568C6DE5.8040201@yandex.ru> <568F1327.30905@yandex.ru> <569DD470.2060603@yandex.ru> <569ED9F6.3050003@yandex.ru> <569EE733.6090406@yandex.ru> <569FAA57.5000302@yandex.ru> <56A00663.7050705@yandex.ru> <6028e88e-e79d-4e85-b759-0f5c75902da0@default> <56A0099A.5070305@yandex.ru> <1d448ddb-cb25-4c0a-80df-7321f83b13ad@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453330272 3282 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2016 22:51:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 20 23:51:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aM1al-0000Cy-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:51:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM1ak-0002L4-OK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM1aB-0001iP-BF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:50:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM1a8-0001ez-5t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:50:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]:34416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM1a7-0001ev-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id cl12so13638467lbc.1 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:50:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zMxBEFLURD4kWmnMgVa9GRbaTwZ16H8WbhcKi1kRMvg=; b=pglWGJpLdKnlC1hkkJXT4H0nGrSDXNrSL7qD4hIC8TZ6U7n0Z55uveGvWF+tmychsP v3NjwVHaAdvAg9zTp/dUvxjG+i5S57d8Z1tU0Ko8Pg3Za8DU5BybTnYhZoGuUXzgHSCC c5tN52J24CHt1p3fMu0ZaAQfINyJVtl5RTSkYz6CFvaNZ7dVOPadIrVZA8x6U8dw39k7 /pxJtAfS0vfS2qeuCbHpgheWIVHomEvjz+dYVOzeRJ7UijUcIt7GfZVXyo08bjJHy2mL OFx/5j0wX+wNE602W7CXoG75m2WgePV5bq53Uy0jpXu7G43hdGHHcLXRrTsT/OKK4c7I zXIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zMxBEFLURD4kWmnMgVa9GRbaTwZ16H8WbhcKi1kRMvg=; b=Yts2p8bivyrwSormbZS+MFMNcwc2CsEN6D0y2KoOn6JX3nGqyIuJFOyC+YQVWhywX3 PS3aBSmIzbkAFC460LeAQGByFvM/CThXLp+NysPqGjnvxX9IDzN1Ly1DMRlGi53H2gnP 3RVq8Kfu7DYLKv6aArDyRpYFWIJcv8lyrTOttKUvTBeiRmWF3qtdeqA+nY2YapRcKepn CriVg54rajmmg6pywb6ZrSmMvabW/CMzW3SuKZN/6wzS69+PgPlnh7XHNMjNa45IQs5L 5nlzepmpkxr33LEsgNSs3550eWzy0VxW07EtYetbSh3ptc3x6kqs0yGVXKWkv3x+NqsI dWOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmlyhAPNjrYDn9pYKRQPEmjK7rVlti0TX7mHHKlWkw0hb8Y1kZdhc+7nNf+I7nZl1CHPaLdums7gVdF7gCulkM4k/vFSA== X-Received: by 10.112.46.35 with SMTP id s3mr13985633lbm.115.1453330227116; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:50:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l67sm5050324lfi.2.2016.01.20.14.50.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:50:26 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 In-Reply-To: <1d448ddb-cb25-4c0a-80df-7321f83b13ad@default> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198472 Archived-At: On 01/21/2016 01:48 AM, Drew Adams wrote: > Why do you think you need to screw with this longstanding feature? > Would it be that hard for you to update _your_ code - to fit Emacs? Not possible. all-completions is, like you say, documented to behave in a certain way. We want to introduce completion tables that perform a more lax kind of completion. It would make sense if all-completions didn't work on them.