From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:35:15 +0300 Message-ID: <56926C23.6000708@yandex.ru> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <5b7c961c-e5ff-4ca2-bb26-dfc1d1e60d7f@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452436532 12522 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2016 14:35:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 15:35:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aIH5Y-0007X5-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:35:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIH5Y-0006PH-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:35:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIH5V-0006PC-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:35:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIH5S-00039S-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:35:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]:36321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIH5S-00039O-FH; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:35:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id oh2so243110646lbb.3; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 06:35:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i0DQZTRBuL1sWF7tZpZAYD8HE0oBtZyOzNovcthhwck=; b=fOEtyXfGj1MU2OQZZht0BGlmLDrEY6pYvMw9F+pqBJxRavrQFSyUxBZBczVvWFqAsm jJClyNMm55vQKzLBhpqTj8e6AXJhS9rNZvsIdtegAIKLGlnyJpSn2a+FSzb5tGdM0okz vq2Pjidj+CDBqgtG+OakBae6ooppBkD2z7jTzi/wYJ5KZDBHWjpgRuniU8cj0GP+5y9I YCmkiPKT13jN05dyQPLw7GDAbuYqQm3odPrkl33jqqmP1twopEXWMeoZEvanVB2MHfhl uQ1CDaSUmf66NJbys5BVO5Klc9Btis0GHCIHBFfBLlD3vPbpV5jI6+dKFe7oopkdMT5z +gcg== X-Received: by 10.112.129.134 with SMTP id nw6mr44645230lbb.10.1452436517683; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 06:35:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm14686676lbp.21.2016.01.10.06.35.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jan 2016 06:35:16 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/43.0 In-Reply-To: <5b7c961c-e5ff-4ca2-bb26-dfc1d1e60d7f@default> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197964 Archived-At: On 01/10/2016 09:29 AM, Drew Adams wrote: > What makes you "fairly sure" of that? FWIW, my own guess > is that `A' and `Q' in Dired are heavily used. (As they > should be.) They could be used, but apparently not in conjunction with tags-loop-continue. Just how much time has passed since we've given the tags-loop-continue's binding to xref-pop-marker-stack before this question has come up? And we're not talking about it because a user complained. We're discussing it because we've been reminded of it while updating the documentation.