From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:19:56 +0300 Message-ID: <5686da19-24a4-0401-7a00-a41fab02b920@yandex.ru> References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <0e41cd9e-8be3-f67a-6958-7bad38ee1266@gmx.at> <6c86c25b-22df-2b69-34fe-539605f624ba@yandex.ru> <7dd69fe5-4ef4-782c-2fba-031d475f6406@yandex.ru> <32fb4915-be55-f753-5f6c-423a09030fd6@gmx.at> <8b252ea4-5902-d21e-a0d7-cdb3ddbb4e08@yandex.ru> <39d47d8c.4bad.16fcd672191.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <729d39eb-d0b4-2cc5-cac3-e129a3effa87@yandex.ru> <06c6b6fb-ce6f-456b-6a22-c5a26a0ab297@gmx.at> <50912835-37d2-f15b-8fd1-b6619893d1ce@yandex.ru> <4a424bf3-ee08-b114-73ef-287bde14003b@gmx.at> <05459ded-2ee2-73b3-0c2b-62febcf0d356@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="1321"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: martin rudalics , tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 28 16:20:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwSfU-0000IE-NE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:20:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwSfT-0007dC-QZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:20:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwSem-0006xp-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwSem-0004bM-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:20:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]:42652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwSel-0004Zh-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:20:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id y4so15110043ljj.9 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:19:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oYrBRYLjGS46iJqQOHHIm4umdks2NP4AZ7iOVjRLYjc=; b=Fp0gACB9/ccrhbtXtSRGCC7DGyrtmqd8oGcKmIkwJem0e4pJXBmrYw7YEFMFX9Ab0X AnkR21UMDO0u+GXsHWGxKJK9Thf0V9AH/DBw3p2f1R/ZPDiTCF6Kc7iCUwbO7fQ1fag9 JKj4Oza2tuW5iwD5oRy+smsTuyYCJ9tTrWlszvdKPZ0cFKV4xfT0ATTBo0EhFBjZtD3c C5hlss6C8BeW9DekE3vEhWE2/AhLU768EP6AA3Ppgov2GFpR1eIIrNCfzxHf1UGKtq8A y19x+nSMig45fsI4vyNXaYV3jDAgxDQ5IBV6orfd8dVJe6/Qdq2Iw4lkbdVXAnos5H/a /clg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oYrBRYLjGS46iJqQOHHIm4umdks2NP4AZ7iOVjRLYjc=; b=f78wz6heOFPfbqsW/BMyChkl+gS0TlN4Gd7MQZIgd/xgl2ZItLZRu83vGrRmxMg9uV uG4wY+EXhuUVyoY/ntllO7rAg4PcuKIZLA1BXMPS2Zcb09cQN3QruIdSnpeIF9BahoA2 A8X8oqM9DQwOBqUygyswoo0famBnn9AJvbuIaukB0n1c9uyOMPm9qhhro8FPgHCaz6QN /rUue8ZFt5RYOvxcviF9OoWnURnLt/wDB3jmZ9uzL7LpBYF67tAGRnyDQqHyYHwJX2Nx itrONKSKikhIfEN2JfbAgwlrCpAhRBpNLdwv1DhgQgYLyFf0ivVwug+J9lEK44P1kOAp GokQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWMhQDY6IWiaQVI/HiJCtFMC1DsC3BqgRzCaKimBkpphB0QMIYG oWixbHWobxUIU2qGRIEOCYIJHjgDc/8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyEA3wi19bfMFBMaFTwGcSJ87eqGNk6M2+ApWYoeVBaIncvfss0jAewgAtS2Ahljv9fw8aYsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:93c5:: with SMTP id p5mr13404146ljh.192.1580224798000; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:19:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g15sm9827445ljl.10.2020.01.28.07.19.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:19:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <05459ded-2ee2-73b3-0c2b-62febcf0d356@gmx.at> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244707 Archived-At: On 28.01.2020 12:46, martin rudalics wrote: > >> Dragging the right and bottom borders too?  Here dragging any border is > >> usually smooth with very occasional jumps.  But it's much better than > >> moving. > > > > Yes. I described that later in the previous email. > > It just doesn't make sense.  Moving a frame is a no-brainer, regardless > of whether you do it via the title bar or via the mode li Resizing the frame. Dragging the borders (right and bottom too) resizes the frame, and doing that with an un-decorated normal frame exhibits the same broken resizing behavior.