From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: UP and DOWN with multi-line minibuffer history Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:43:29 +0200 Message-ID: <566F8C61.9040108@yandex.ru> References: <83wpsj6978.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4czz63l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83lh8y5q3k.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1u9vqni.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83d1u94s23.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450151048 4234 80.91.229.3 (15 Dec 2015 03:44:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 15 04:44:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a8gWs-0005RC-5E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 04:43:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8gWm-0005bG-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:43:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8gWY-0005b4-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8gWT-000861-5j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:34558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8gWS-00085w-Vv; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:43:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p66so91173780wmp.1; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:43:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=16fX8BMnsOVar+gPxN+xQx0kFbRZ45M1wwPvQGTUoiY=; b=KTQB7bqfvX898XWtnRTdeRBmlXS8nO2RgelztX1rV5Q6YIv/RZZnjHkZfiPUnazftr sgEIHn7T+y3BZdGfK8uKOFczpPoUMhk/dhgB7VdsMtpAY0oYNshiJbeK8i3Wh43iTyPe YWwWGSv9mX/L+se2FPv3Uc1HpVXqhr1dHmV7t2Z5TX67J6vHwzu4SBX4ZBEKT96tsvjH p+ME8UCqg2QR5hZ33Y/6bUvG2lgTMAWQzHgAAx7IjfiU3UA210ndezdLc3mCQ+mN1Ek6 JMnd7rHPoKLFrfL8REItyeaVAn2fIUuibcYi9mnax9fFGXSMjvUpz1GiAMjIc15pzdPg G4Ig== X-Received: by 10.28.32.150 with SMTP id g144mr1607581wmg.92.1450151012066; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:43:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id az6sm32359912wjc.25.2015.12.14.19.43.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:43:30 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <83d1u94s23.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196287 Archived-At: On 12/14/2015 05:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Yes, it's consistency vs minor inconvenience in certain use cases. I > think consistency should win big time. I'd say the choice is rather "consistency and inconvenience in some use cases" vs "inconvenience in some other use cases". I've never used the goal column, so that problem sounds fairly obscure, personally.