From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: First draft of the Emacs website Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:01:45 +0200 Message-ID: <565B75C9.4040600@yandex.ru> References: <87io4lem98.fsf@petton.fr> <565B170E.7010407@yandex.ru> <87zixwd2at.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448834533 23089 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2015 22:02:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:02:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Nicolas Petton , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 23:02:05 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3A2l-0006Tg-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:02:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37941 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3A2p-0007WW-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3A2f-0007G9-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:01:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3A2W-00058N-8y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:01:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]:36058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3A2W-00058A-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so107761445wmw.1 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:01:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2TUL9TQyW8zJyWBqkLr6ydzflNAIEh46ptr/+p/mHqQ=; b=dYZ8KSbGCTYVfE/YjUKhWsaVrDfDNV3nK3CHVIPorpS/o+6eWrDUaqu3BFcAEhdl7m lMa6jq4RhM26QytslPgdPTVw5ZBFnRsYRDIGo7aECBN/dpTlXjclPeQdnoQ8NsKEhPM5 pNSMyzl1p3O7Pi0R+fMhsND2tCf0tm8w/blEMB93rLISxfTFi7oQdXG/xJIQkaZOb4W8 e0nH/0+Tde4GEj36V91PoynNF9NJ0JHKK4qH+9BhfDgoew6f9yyN+4uU2jS3Y0mJWc6T qtcspO/ddR5Y0i2DqITLWLJL4UGBhSTRGIVKlEZnF/R1/XAErihUEt3zvs8oXsAs++UO rcDQ== X-Received: by 10.194.94.100 with SMTP id db4mr24190340wjb.85.1448834507589; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:01:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m4sm22129735wjz.31.2015.11.29.14.01.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:01:46 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <87zixwd2at.fsf@petton.fr> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195578 Archived-At: On 11/29/2015 09:38 PM, Nicolas Petton wrote: > I understand what you mean, but disagree with you. Each section has on > purpose its own set of primary and secondary colors, going from a dark > grey with the Emacs colors (slightly warmer set of colors), down to the > red of the FSF. I'm not saying that the set of colors is arbitrary. >> , and I'd rather you did something to the second section: it jumps out >> as very high-contrast, for some reason. > > I can try to lower the contrast of the background gradient a bit, but I > won't do it too much. Gradient? The background looks solid to me. I think you can just darken the text color a bit (e.g. to #ddd), and it'll help the situation.