From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:53:44 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <564E1AB8.4000504@cs.ucla.edu> References: <877flswse5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737wgw7kf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87io5bv1it.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87egfzuwca.fsf@lifelogs.com> <876118u6f2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737w3qero.fsf@lifelogs.com> <831tbn9g9j.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5upw7o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83ziya8xph.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4du80xo.fsf@gnu.org> <564DF0F6.5060501@cs.ucla.edu> <8637w17tyb.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83610x983y.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447959254 19565 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2015 18:54:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, tzz@lifelogs.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 19 19:54:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzULK-0000Cx-Ht for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:54:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43543 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzULE-000824-Sx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:53:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzULB-00081y-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzULB-0004c1-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:53:53 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:53657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzUL4-0004ab-UG; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:53:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA17160DFC; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:53:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id zDw0sk9CJp8a; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:53:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDDE160DFD; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:53:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id XsBbs4cOsZtg; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:53:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2D7F160DFC; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:53:44 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 In-Reply-To: <83610x983y.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194813 Archived-At: On 11/19/2015 10:06 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > But then module.c should be renamed to emacs-module.c. Or even > emodule.[ch], which is shorter. A quick Google search suggests that Enlightenment uses emodule.h, so if we want the name to be globally unique then we'll need a more-specific name like emacs-module.h or gemodule.h (and likewise for .c). > Alternatively, we could have an internal and an external header files; > the latter will have to be installed by "make install" in the include > tree, and so doesn't have to be used for internal compilation. If possible I'd rather use the same .h file for both internal and external. Simpler, more-often checked, that sort of thing.