From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:25:44 +0100 Message-ID: <564CB498.2090405@online.de> References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9komkty.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447867504 8426 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2015 17:25:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:25:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 18:24:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6TW-0006eh-E5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:24:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37189 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6TV-0002nl-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:24:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59013) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6TS-0002nf-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:24:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6TN-0002Ac-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:24:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:57500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6TN-0002A7-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:24:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.3.42.138]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MeBeI-1ZjDD31QnW-00PwBw for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:24:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:eIkhetyXrVD/8Xt9yZNo4Y1nsq38r8d6zMso8THks/9N98DahhH slPk1XlSA5y66BnglYM5r2PGQm20UCpSxbjUf/pQV0rWwn/KGZ8ni/cSab9OTuX3idELr4q BT3AYGN7gQYikafuNt/a5uDp2XOd/AOFrDuyybcgv609DqQ3uuFRlvuFMUsilAJ+sF8XS1W m7ebCOUIcAUXs2J4Iy6WQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:J3fAliT48Fc=:tAyBEEmrumbph/Oxywem7w MUJFrpoEiTNSXlwnL2MHmwUtNHSj6Mh78eaovwEuxdjpLYaYHXRZVLV9o+g9t8fYe27DaAtoL BAZ7YE1ocxtjLyqJaBv3AMAYemYy7c+F8QWQKE8qzXWXWcT4oMqNsrnGvOyBk2LC7B3680O4C ncyBv7AHNN5bTTfySSZwE2sKGJ4XLPi1tmk3FIU168mf8Yu842e9MpX0pKVWSPZclfvvAmzQr c3R/Fo1N2yTB/VfmE3Hj6a0bWDObqg4qQTMvf/76svJiFFMuN4WEy7J3xE3wZHMfZHKuUFnsz 1hN3oUeegQZtBspfmVZTPqPzWVbMUqol7BcaH1+z40A7Ti0YRRj/GJSocRC88qxMtnG6ySxGj 0oJaGISUdLLJvlKuTY/Z9r/zt7u3CMBzaF7XNLhd4ZMitbS+SosE76H+IP5YF/JKv2E7/W5kE P+/mjOFI2YBRo6wF29K5DvjfTJRZNZIfTb8heubNtIvLGw15gbT9Jg0TltYwFDOEAfVxi7i2y lexzQFF2Q8Zvp1YTAvBgQFbLxKiLdZV9Go/H2vc3CSRKSQ4D5vDNjf5EKc6gu35uoHZ76dJod Qf5UZTqNsqyFxgkuLALYJpe/DjqWP8gBijXpLSBtqVafPrv7gVi3R5RqSjh7cBmJ8AB4WrNet /Y2FATRKS5+oF/oX2yJShxA6tfrlxU0/6eFqP3vNFnG6ZOSRfgDIlLGTkzpghDP+Daic4y4Dy oDJWlskUnHNA7L5Q X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.24 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194723 Archived-At: On 18.11.2015 00:16, John Wiegley wrote: >>>>>> Richard Stallman writes: >> This might be a good thing to poll the users about. > Since we're discussing a change in behavior from past versions, and many of us > have come to rely on that behavior, I would rather we simply revert to > previous behavior for "C-o at 0" in 25.1. > > John > +1