From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rename refactoring, or something like that Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:14:11 +0200 Message-ID: <564B2823.5050305@yandex.ru> References: <56480D6C.2080408@yandex.ru> <87a8qe9jeo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <564A424A.2070904@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447766119 7513 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2015 13:15:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_Fuentes?= , Emacs developers To: John Yates Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 14:15:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zyg6Q-0005tM-5G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:15:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zyg6P-0004s6-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:15:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zyg5U-0003oO-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zyg5P-0002tt-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:14:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:33157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zyg5O-0002tp-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:14:14 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so226835882wme.0 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 05:14:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GMzqx7Qll780VZYioBC+DLcM7+1j3i2HHS4gbSZKhHQ=; b=q8DvqhUD9yJZSsCCsF0JHc5/4qhTsHsBlFCmqdKo79IazCkhMdEWO5p/nBqpPg3Kg4 DM36Z/w3f/NGNDHRn4MOI3ztteGGBWmPvXfsqyjPxVmaMMfLwOjnFpAxwrxyWM7AOTEb I+0epwOa2w1GrwSkSFMWRT7e+xqJkMi1xIzW9o+mvd5zR2kNvJuPcPLSuP8UV9cSxfus yeyCIJCBIHOkUpHHgsBZezu29xWLnyYIWFgpFDPpdLLf8LV9tgYwgQ0pPmLHYQExfCIW HfrIWWnD+ujrLwMIrAetTz6/qeqgmKm0eiFFa7jJK/yEOEBhYNKtkiAWia6a0lns5sOb vaUA== X-Received: by 10.194.118.226 with SMTP id kp2mr44380903wjb.59.1447766054238; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 05:14:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u205sm23894598wmb.12.2015.11.17.05.14.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 05:14:13 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194641 Archived-At: On 11/17/2015 01:10 PM, John Yates wrote: > If the rename is not based on a strong semantic framework (e.g. in the > C++ world something that can truly grok all of the name resolution > rules) then there will need to be some means of incorporating human > input (a la query-and-replace). If such querying occurs on a site by > site basis then there could be a query respone that says "yes, do the > rename but then pause and let me do some editing". That an interesting suggestion. Not the highest priority, IMHO, but it should be possible to add such a feature to any renames interface we settle on, later.