From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making --with-wide-int the default Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:54:59 +0100 Message-ID: <5646F6E3.10509@gmx.at> References: <56117F37.9060808@dancol.org> <83oag087gs.fsf@gnu.org> <83oafz70im.fsf@gnu.org> <5620AF43.4050401@cs.ucla.edu> <83k2qn6xfm.fsf@gnu.org> <5620B4FA.1000804@cs.ucla.edu> <83wptojs1r.fsf@gnu.org> <56444C66.8050506@gmx.at> <83r3jugx8g.fsf@gnu.org> <87io56nu0a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83lha1dl87.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447494245 18953 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2015 09:44:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 14 10:43:56 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxXNC-0003A7-4g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:43:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33159 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxXNB-0003c5-3G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxWc8-0001ga-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 03:55:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxWc7-0007X5-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 03:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:62235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxWc1-0007V2-HB; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 03:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.68.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnxVE-1adAxP3sBk-00fyFT; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:55:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83lha1dl87.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3tPBL2FkrNIUmcvhR8ZbVZRTGEPwB8t/fov9IU8ItsRZP5gPLZE 1g4698sOaPW9nil/gRwxJqpeSo3QNFHqXDXT5fR+nZjUMomOIsgG5V9EkEJVwaLIetQQsa2 L5kEKh7hPAr/KHspDtK0UfDmkMR1STPXUkBr0W96tH9x009+8d/F7G7cppMUv3+Tfrk2BWs 3Qsl/MfBwM/uuzBDw7Tfw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:34r7/EXRvCs=:alnBNysIkWztrsPw/3mQ5A Deh04his/gvnmlsQb1BCe6FKTPLEiA2el2tBE/aFby7aURLysz5vSP+4eATUc/b+uR1M9MjuX qeMuTQr93NOVyRlSzCBQvmr2Al2cjwQCeFV3rWy6cEGNCKRL5A2UKDoek7hs/sdOaxrZbL7H/ RZUdma08cnHZ+LzAfy65hAa8F36hOSQZNgu4aoybnZJQHyhXiVml+/TqKo9NpDUL+shW0ayvZ fJTeKScDV5iAOtzbu9so7a0UxrUTkOJSlfDP6YYLFj7mvhBCHq3UWQ+1EG71bTTF6UT4YsZbj iVqQCCVcdOkf7a+4yz4Eq9lJWnqvVlEcbDYudOcBH4nHGcl5q2l5SkXr9c/Hb7XyH494Cj7qW EElJd4hpGib9t3W9fj3sjwulCP+5g9LVGSg6ZLD2mEUosnt6TixyaTK1zg9YQLBaQrO8U1Fnb i/mfvCPxBHiClhVrtyjR3+VP+uocEqbr8USYkoOyEsPg3EtoP4xF95sjplXuV08tHtGH9awZP 5ptoDd0nhky+utprGTT2V2Dm2JG1JB/pnCAXhFOiDrcsBy/w6YtmA7lLBaRV8Udba6/qTC0m0 krGy3z3Iz38oFfDUnEY15rcOSD8Hk0BcxD4Hk94GJdelCtfkPgDPCk9mlH2WoLjdoHoPD2HHl r8CexrcVy51adcV5HamCvcSGLURtf/HTO2InQ89uWXfw9+BzLy+je8WEW19vrmBi/HMabMVGD 8yDnks2nosVIcALiolQrs9RL4cloBm7EpSKYVY8+zZQoIamtgLwuoIA+QHWG9H7OsLEPWlKU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194445 Archived-At: > Faced with such powerful opposition, I guess this now becomes your > decision, John. I can always build my own Emacs with that option; the > question is what we want for the majority of our users on 32-bit > systems. Please note that I'm not part of that opposition. I just wanted to mention that my current configuration leaves me no other choice than to build without that option. And if it were the first time I ran into the problem that my build is unbearably slow, I'd like to have some guidance on how to possibly get out of it. martin