From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:42:31 +0200 Message-ID: <5643E077.7010508@yandex.ru> References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <5640C6A0.5010709@yandex.ru> <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> <868u65afvh.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87lha5snji.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <87d1vhsmuj.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <878u65slue.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <874mgtsjwn.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <867flp8nb7.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <9e33129a-07d0-4abe-a94e-32d6d881519b@default> <86bnb06g7g.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447289011 29099 80.91.229.3 (12 Nov 2015 00:43:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Wiegley , stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, Drew Adams , emacs-devel To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 01:43:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwfz1-0007Bo-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:43:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43797 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwfz0-0000tt-Cp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:43:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwfyJ-0008MR-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:42:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwfyG-0003bB-Hs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:42:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]:38735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwfyG-0003b7-Bj; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:42:36 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so69771663wme.1; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gn2EpSHA9biOfKP6jV9k5O/3F+AgrPThsSi3cor3fH4=; b=kWcd232mtV0vBu5Sk+cPbcNvNIi9VkqaMlon6C5QECkyh1B6ZrUoEoGpvhQtWHcbMf 2xoAZfkoLiBqMH2XGoSfM2/jmzDChuxsq2TpVtYNAFQg2hYQ6Rl82T9fx1+TRn0qw4a3 k0y6NMWon9sofWkdmf5QQJb5LJHJwTc1Ltzde/rezQ35fDd2bmMDECiSdrGdRI4M/5QG CM5AT47hfPXKZ/TTMQXnrpoKYyQ/eA53tyAZS53nx3mPgXtcMkIAT/GEzSW2v7TN7toU qKBPRSMMqb40gmRxWJIimurEnetks1VFW11fMvPXXGzyXPgVzhF7wO9BLqZKYTb+FPIm D0Iw== X-Received: by 10.28.63.204 with SMTP id m195mr3575431wma.11.1447288955853; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r65sm27875286wmb.20.2015.11.11.16.42.33 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:35 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194182 Archived-At: On 11/12/2015 02:35 AM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > Richard, do think such as system would be viable copyright-wise? > Of course, we would only do this when the author assigns copyright, but > there's a very real possibility that a careless maintainer might add > someone else's code to this page. And then this (non-copyright-assigned) > code would be automatically pulled and committed to Elpa. We should also consider whether this is sound from the security standpoint. I mean, pushing the code to ELPA without any review from the core developers.