From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: project.el semantics Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:47:35 +0200 Message-ID: <564249D7.8020606@yandex.ru> References: <86pp1j4ejm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86mvwn11u1.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F8E451.9080902@yandex.ru> <86bnd21q0r.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F97EA2.9000408@yandex.ru> <86mvwmz58h.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F9A5F8.1030505@yandex.ru> <86pp1ixem2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55FAFC36.5010506@yandex.ru> <86twqrww0u.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> <563EA9B9.5080404@yandex.ru> <86vb9dufs0.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <563F4915.1080008@yandex.ru> <867flrbksb.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <56409F2D.9060300@yandex.ru> <5641412B.8080106@yandex.ru> <564145FC.5020905@yandex.ru> <5641634C.9000409@yandex.ru> <86d1vhah6h.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447184878 24620 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 19:47:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 20:47:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEtZ-000670-65 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:47:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEtZ-0007e6-6l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:47:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEtL-0007dz-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEtH-0005es-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:47:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:35008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEtH-0005ej-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:47:39 -0500 Original-Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so85940233wmd.0 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:47:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oMTmKqmV6lR/mUT4h4823aIx8FFayTETqqiBSKOTJ0c=; b=WfK5bYIEZqiIx2F2y7vxHQ5wIS5t+91GsrzMYM3t8XrutjiVguLlM2FQaJkfgRUZm7 ryE7sK/6T3MJFxrBs8UugxHjfFTRnrLSi2F3GyJY500zXuo/0eza8hM5x100mb+0YGG/ 90WF3RzBWxPt0kw2LbmHeLzmw5CV44bDi6PbRHy3VhMm6J2Oq1HP63H7+ZEAcdkrKSof vClOi8NxIIbfgCIwKrS5bhllVQiMM80tgMxkB5CGyOvnuitC1ftB+plWuSAd7C38W52x k5DyUjxZfW1Iyx/3wFkIAxEmZQ0JCDdeFTL+G9HbkJG8lowkA/SCtOhzJah1EiB1+e0N zveQ== X-Received: by 10.28.143.8 with SMTP id r8mr36302585wmd.3.1447184858538; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:47:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id bf8sm5173643wjc.22.2015.11.10.11.47.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:47:37 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <86d1vhah6h.fsf@stephe-leake.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193947 Archived-At: On 11/10/2015 07:38 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: > And also "project library roots". > > I'm trying to clarify what they mean, with little success. That's a rather strong complaint. No doubt the current wording can be improved, but I think it's at least intelligible, and unambiguous enough.