From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: project.el semantics Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:23:56 +0200 Message-ID: <5641634C.9000409@yandex.ru> References: <86pp1j4ejm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F899EA.7050700@yandex.ru> <86lhc73wog.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86mvwn11u1.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F8E451.9080902@yandex.ru> <86bnd21q0r.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F97EA2.9000408@yandex.ru> <86mvwmz58h.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F9A5F8.1030505@yandex.ru> <86pp1ixem2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55FAFC36.5010506@yandex.ru> <86twqrww0u.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> <563EA9B9.5080404@yandex.ru> <86vb9dufs0.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <563F4915.1080008@yandex.ru> <867flrbksb.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <56409F2D.9060300@yandex.ru> <5641412B.8080106@yandex.ru> <564145FC.5020905@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447125878 17758 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 03:24:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:24:38 +0000 (UTC) To: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 04:24:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvzXs-00045t-T1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:24:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57114 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvzXr-00037O-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:24:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvzXg-00034w-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:24:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvzXL-0004ST-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:24:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]:34758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvzXL-0004Rh-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:23:59 -0500 Original-Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so137155174wmn.1 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:23:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XFdMc2iAbywvUpnrg97RsOmxtLnHW+I9Oh8Jix5kp3A=; b=N+jW5b7vrkW5lrrc/iVjWToqJuV2gBuEM9VqxFzzFfcYbo3bLVzBJa/doXr+YzBf/Z 4WS5dpM0U0l83eIOPPF1vbWewH4nYutEs32hrFgyPBBJagW/2VMSearib5imNAMfokbD zToRESVbm4AYlLL1UfQ1ozbCM0oxOdrjk5kOSO4bfRrZ1+AAMBfJ1XPwz0VHOYu6SIUa 6ze9H0FhsSHuAZh3McIbCEjn1/wZdhG5pF3sFyj/Ro53LeBl8coboxvZ4HAD2ccWjsvN etiRmavSOTS1Pv/TnxoeTK8T+PIiPRzg2rxQKAnNRonxzfQw2bVU1zgcnmHdDL+T9dTg ofHg== X-Received: by 10.194.173.100 with SMTP id bj4mr1129395wjc.95.1447125838885; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:23:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l128sm9323139wmf.10.2015.11.09.19.23.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:23:57 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193814 Archived-At: On 11/10/2015 03:40 AM, John Wiegley wrote: > Ah, a code review. If you like. I just meant it's hard to discuss code without having seen it. > OK, that sounds like good starting functionality to me. I've often wanted a > simple, general way to reference the "project root". Except we have "project roots", so it's a little bit more complicated. But yes. And we also have a few commands now that take advantage of this API.