From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: project.el semantics Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 02:58:19 +0200 Message-ID: <5641412B.8080106@yandex.ru> References: <86pp1j4ejm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F899EA.7050700@yandex.ru> <86lhc73wog.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86mvwn11u1.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F8E451.9080902@yandex.ru> <86bnd21q0r.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F97EA2.9000408@yandex.ru> <86mvwmz58h.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F9A5F8.1030505@yandex.ru> <86pp1ixem2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55FAFC36.5010506@yandex.ru> <86twqrww0u.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> <563EA9B9.5080404@yandex.ru> <86vb9dufs0.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <563F4915.1080008@yandex.ru> <867flrbksb.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <56409F2D.9060300@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447117119 19848 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 00:58:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:58:39 +0000 (UTC) To: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 01:58:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvxGZ-00086F-Cr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 01:58:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56723 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvxGY-0001Ey-Vz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:58:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvxGU-0001Ed-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvxGR-0002Qr-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:34153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvxGR-0002Ql-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so133725461wmn.1 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:58:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UC7RRKusCslSLGAHptVWS94LzdAHj1BDUKirxEu41nQ=; b=p0GeJikUpJPS0z2MiyTeCCFj3Q/J9Jr152TW227HU3z3f9JcQ3PX/Xz7QkrGuDMBaA ZETMOhVs6aRJtVgOPhK0rgSpZkPLm7VNWVFBYvrs+1yO62Ejpko1pWVFoigmB+Zg7ryr TkcGROxhYz34DbnRHemlx/pvKxlp7S5qcFyKd5YEZG2cTUFPxNT00i6+L3EFIoOjIJNA RHiRf0yHC8iIh1KDrUIrsmgNdBYBLVL+froFLoo7LJtjFA7fAVfh8v+KvTJpujubCG9u hsLwLiMs9LEf3jyoWgN4O50MVJOQiSBCukm1RvkRTNvSSu51NzQE5xdiotjZ91sgqfCK cE7w== X-Received: by 10.28.96.4 with SMTP id u4mr1524980wmb.52.1447117102415; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:58:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ft4sm637847wjb.37.2015.11.09.16.58.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:58:21 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193799 Archived-At: On 11/10/2015 12:16 AM, John Wiegley wrote: > Sure, although I haven't been following the history of this thread. Could > someone please summarize where we're at now? The current state of affairs is in lisp/progmodes/project.el (200+ lines), and you can read the current bout of the discussion starting with http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-11/msg00525.html I hope that's not too much. > Also, how does this library > relate to something like Projectile, which is what I presently use for > project-related commands. Does its Commentary answer this question?