From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Semrau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Multiple Eshell process? Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:07:54 +0100 Message-ID: <56410B2A.3060103@openmailbox.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447105546 10069 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 21:45:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 21:45:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 22:45:40 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuFo-0002l4-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:45:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55771 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuFo-0005VV-2t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:45:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33263) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuFl-0005VQ-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:45:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuFg-00050S-B4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:45:29 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp16.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.50]:58543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuFg-00050B-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:45:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 43BFE7C10E7; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:07:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1447103275; bh=5b4gpObI4qbqR+mOsuMP+FxxwQY5v/5ZfAdD9XCVrd4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=l94d01mczHwTZE+K7qrCZpI26i7ED9L+IVhcDjAmGXM5s2ggJpwn7431fguOVBQV8 CzGA0bw1Lh0pV4sHV9d6/pTL/uAcI6n2ibeYiVKtowkAAj9gHs0d3/32EUJycHIIuD nnF0HGwuUIoCkx9YsAZ2ybf5BWw++Zyj/mb7AGkc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1447103275; bh=5b4gpObI4qbqR+mOsuMP+FxxwQY5v/5ZfAdD9XCVrd4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=l94d01mczHwTZE+K7qrCZpI26i7ED9L+IVhcDjAmGXM5s2ggJpwn7431fguOVBQV8 CzGA0bw1Lh0pV4sHV9d6/pTL/uAcI6n2ibeYiVKtowkAAj9gHs0d3/32EUJycHIIuD nnF0HGwuUIoCkx9YsAZ2ybf5BWw++Zyj/mb7AGkc= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 62.4.1.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193761 Archived-At: On 09.11.2015 21:43, Jesuz Networks Inc. wrote: > When I'm compiling something in Eshell, of Importing my mail with > offlinemap tool, then I need to wait long time before a process in Eshell > is finished and I can use Eshell again. > As far as it seems, I could only run one Eshell process. > > This is somewhat inconvenient. For example, when you run a process in Guake > terminal, you can spawn another Guake terminal in a new tab and do your > thing while a process is still running in another tab. > > So I'm wondering if this could be possible with Eshell? > > Rene Froger > When you invoke Eshell with C-u as prefix, Emacs spawns a fresh and seperate Eshell session rather than switching to the existing Eshell buffer.