From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:26:58 +0200 Message-ID: <5640C952.2090509@yandex.ru> References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <83ziynma4s.fsf@gnu.org> <5640C6A0.5010709@yandex.ru> <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447086443 28755 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 16:27:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aaronecay@gmail.com, Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 17:27:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpHi-0006n2-FU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:27:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpHh-0003Tu-P9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:27:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpHd-0003R6-Ao for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:27:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpHZ-0004r9-5p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]:38539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpHZ-0004r5-0p; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so77688923wme.1; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:27:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U6SCANlX209dqcREJMwh+Aw8E+eABMVvL58VT8Au5p4=; b=WVK4UTizPW8jNIHjWVIYld93jKqRGmIbRZH/MKBTRt1MReLmpy/BMmW3DRdXTrNw93 z0qu0MJg5f4biPCZV1ud1MfUQJfQvmVB95XzEki1ttb2pxg7CsiMIs9ocgCJkVtEZErg w1HSLC22ldpVZTAiWtQ1TdSeLH7QZiXcW6PwbGZhPNylVLGL0KQ0ugv3NPny5cLgnCBb diyRIBFteyRlYW2ZpmdUEw8wk/r/S2PYirmDtAcDfkLUKU1a+PTfpjfuLzxe1B9BtXIi CPeNbhR8iBrxWLJO4aTMYEDREH1yrTm17apgQpyuscj+uIaKLRBZyRHWb9OrTt8/yK8X qo7Q== X-Received: by 10.28.144.138 with SMTP id s132mr25587684wmd.97.1447086420573; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:27:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id bf8sm16232964wjc.22.2015.11.09.08.26.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:26:59 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193725 Archived-At: On 11/09/2015 06:20 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Create yet another package archive? With a separate publishing mechanism? > > Why not? There are several already, no? So far, it seems we're short of manpower to manage even the current one. To manage the infrastructure, improve the scripts, etc. > It does, for most of the core. That's what you do each time you say > "git pull", I believe. I cannot "git pull" a new version of Dired into my stable installation of Emacs 24.5. > It was made before -- that's the "let's move Org and Gnus out" > variant, to which I said I could easily agree. And then there was the > "move everything" one, to which I object for the reasons stated. What > I meant was that there was no 3rd variant, AFAIR. Well, I enumerated 4 packages instead of 2, didn't I? :) I agree that "move everything" is a non-starter (or very hard, at least). So it seems more like a red herring, there's no real use arguing against it.