From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: project.el semantics Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 03:47:37 +0200 Message-ID: <563EA9B9.5080404@yandex.ru> References: <86pp1j4ejm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F899EA.7050700@yandex.ru> <86lhc73wog.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86mvwn11u1.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F8E451.9080902@yandex.ru> <86bnd21q0r.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F97EA2.9000408@yandex.ru> <86mvwmz58h.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55F9A5F8.1030505@yandex.ru> <86pp1ixem2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55FAFC36.5010506@yandex.ru> <86twqrww0u.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446947275 10282 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2015 01:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 01:47:55 +0000 (UTC) To: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 08 02:47:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvF5A-00015j-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 02:47:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvF5A-000628-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:47:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvF57-000623-GC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvF52-0007bG-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:47:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:34127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvF52-0007b8-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:47:40 -0500 Original-Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so50187142wik.1 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 17:47:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rxLrjg80WessBhQl50Yn5SvTgrsJTtCM+e0LUkVGFaE=; b=jwdNdyxI6H+NVxlOk7k7VuQOY103ChJPcfaqiGb38QdfjcPjsGBu4Gy/rj7fS67X4Y wBwnoBH9gw3lNZUXAihKfFpEV5oddBnlDP06mqy8KxvS8Fft1USJxboZK9rcFHWhicmS us5kfwzsxdEe+eBooEJ5M9mj8zwg/IJapm6VTqhtw8t1fFyra2cnVjpDB6hmIL+JygjS yO73VB3XU9cMIRG/Qd99E3lDaiG9Zl6a5LMzTGB6X8y9qEA5JMzPwsSIg683bXucGUzT 90YpIBoiRYH8SXQzDfoahGaH9CMfFzpMwnwB0zWrRldzxJFGLpdy8XDpYfWAK2aPP5IC S7Zw== X-Received: by 10.194.2.34 with SMTP id 2mr22558525wjr.39.1446947259529; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 17:47:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v191sm6533784wmd.24.2015.11.07.17.47.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Nov 2015 17:47:38 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <86twqrww0u.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193575 Archived-At: Hi Stephen, On 09/18/2015 07:08 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: > That means project-search-path should be clearly defined to be either > purely recursive or not, so client code and project backends know > whether to weed out duplicates or not. > > It also means the distinction between project-search-path and > project-roots must be more clearly defined. Please see the commit 9776972 inside the branch project-next. I intend to merge it into master in a day or two. Sorry to stir things around with the rename, but I think it's justified. > If there are use cases where different search paths are desired for > different purposes (such as "source" vs "documentation" above), the > the project API must provide a clear mechanism to distinguish those > cases, so the appropriate search path can be returned. Also see the FIXME commentary above project-library-roots-function; it's waiting for the public opinion. Though it's not really about source vs documentation as much as about different kinds of sources.