From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Brown Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Collation tests in fns-tests.el Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:25:51 -0500 Message-ID: <56378E8F.2060501@cornell.edu> References: <5633AE31.2030501@cornell.edu> <83mvv0yucm.fsf@gnu.org> <5633DCD8.7060706@cornell.edu> <83bnbgyr87.fsf@gnu.org> <5633EC3D.4070903@cornell.edu> <87y4ejbexx.fsf@gmx.de> <834mh7z9rk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446481576 30486 80.91.229.3 (2 Nov 2015 16:26:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 02 17:25:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtHvg-0004ca-4O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:25:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43150 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtHvf-00037A-9C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtHvc-000372-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:25:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtHvZ-0002t3-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:25:52 -0500 Original-Received: from limerock01.mail.cornell.edu ([128.84.13.241]:59663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtHvZ-0002sb-LC; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:25:49 -0500 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Original-Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id tA2GPgbh009396; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:25:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.6] (cpe-67-249-176-138.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.176.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id tA2GPfJO026802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:25:42 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: <834mh7z9rk.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 128.84.13.241 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193111 Archived-At: On 10/31/2015 5:07 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Michael Albinus >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:49:30 +0100 >> >> Ken Brown writes: >> >>>> If Cygwin's implementation of strcoll cannot be fixed, then we should >>>> treat this test on Cygwin as expected failure. >>> >>> I'll probably do that, but I'll wait to see if Michael has anything to add. >> >> I have no other idea, sorry. Let's mark the test case as expected to >> fail for Cygwin. And maybe a note about this behaviour could be added in >> doc/lispref/strings.texi. > > Well, one other idea is for Cygwin's Emacs build to have its private > implementation of strcoll, similar to what w32_compare_strings does. I could do this in the future if necessary. For now, I've just followed Michael's suggestion. Ken