From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:07:58 +0300 Message-ID: <562BD70E.4070400@yandex.ru> References: <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <5612E996.7090700@yandex.ru> <83bnc7tavr.fsf@gnu.org> <5618C92A.3040207@yandex.ru> <83a8rrt9ag.fsf@gnu.org> <5618D376.1080700@yandex.ru> <831td3t62e.fsf@gnu.org> <561A6199.1020901@cumego.com> <561B9D87.70504@yandex.ru> <87vb9wcpw9.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <83eggkwdgh.fsf@gnu.org> <562BB9C0.4070600@yandex.ru> <834mhgw5ry.fsf@gnu.org> <562BBC9F.9020806@yandex.ru> <8337x0w5dm.fsf@gnu.org> <562BCAB6.7000206@yandex.ru> <83y4esum70.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445713712 25584 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2015 19:08:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nix@esperi.org.uk, esperanto@cumego.com, adatgyujto@gmail.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 24 21:08:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq4Ay-0005AA-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:08:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45375 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq4Ax-0003FT-Pm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:08:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq4Ai-0003FB-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq4Ad-0000jp-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:33359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq4Ad-0000jS-1c; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so116666266wij.0; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fVKx0kNfWo7asxTxE+u7CnZMYNJmYOaeMw62PIoIUGs=; b=UWoCNDHjpz8pELCLIsqQtBx2LzK2PwqNPTWn34p+A9kslpt+eu0vi/LjpcYhsLlUwP IBaNux5grQICs2BwUJvnEoPPceZB0w5BWEAQDILp5LsPur0DanSBip+cmjzkBNxrNl8t ABUI9jqZMghoZ+pfKnkOY3pJ0QW3uJ7aCUcyrUh47tzvj/eVLPCXEMXH5XmTOv7NVjye E7scyS+UgkR8aRIOW/CHCJMwghiVWqY/Wg7HzMLzvBNkr3A9TV6P4lVwrICfLv93cs9N cfVfEGkvT5ZiPQ88EUyDJwrKbeQOEP5daumVnCSh0H2YW6xqm/Nzt++GWxLKyMX/ojM+ Dg3w== X-Received: by 10.180.198.227 with SMTP id jf3mr12153769wic.94.1445713682344; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm29549758wjz.29.2015.10.24.12.07.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:08:00 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <83y4esum70.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192578 Archived-At: On 10/24/2015 09:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Database format can have a real performance impact. > > Yes, but the issue is performance, not the database format. In a situation like that, someone else might have called lower performance a "symptom", and not "the issue".