From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:44:54 +0300 Message-ID: <56225EE6.7010603@yandex.ru> References: <5612E996.7090700@yandex.ru> <83bnc7tavr.fsf@gnu.org> <5618C92A.3040207@yandex.ru> <83a8rrt9ag.fsf@gnu.org> <5618D376.1080700@yandex.ru> <56194171.1080006@siege-engine.com> <5619E7C7.5000401@yandex.ru> <561A9E6D.8080403@gmail.com> <561BCF54.7060000@yandex.ru> <561D85DE.4090304@gmail.com> <561F1A75.1000909@yandex.ru> <561FA2A3.9030409@gmail.com> <5620F60A.1030104@yandex.ru> <5621B4D5.9040607@gmail.com> <5621BB2A.5000802@yandex.ru> <562242E3.10503@gmail.com> <56225A57.9030705@yandex.ru> <87oafxlfr6.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445093124 15092 80.91.229.3 (17 Oct 2015 14:45:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eric Ludlam , Eli Zaretskii , adatgyujto@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Engster Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 17 16:45:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnSjW-0000D7-1Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:45:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnSjV-0005cM-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnSjF-0005cA-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnSjC-0005pZ-7k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:36992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnSjC-0005pR-1p; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:44:58 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfv8 with SMTP id fv8so25229251wic.0; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:44:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CAKg7TsCd14MIbiLyIyx/tHvXwLeO6Uw/8h51idnhJA=; b=xum5SnU188HPst29dS0msjRnpjEnZUspiVeWK/56ShMiTE0uxZfHVgymkfplmVpUwA bCbJGmWAmKqOECUEo4QFPRZWSuIfXa/+boBDWSA5Pn0g6qsb82uXfopVEi5KsbdfUx5p 7/a731Kt6mVvw1q9a41SPuUqqSI9UwWnaXl4MHRPYcphG87hl1sD7x4YtjEmJ7l5H2Wk VhEQVcxAluUGMSDIH15/Sr2XZrmjOI3+GG6EzqdKAwzNSxu7XBcHePWnNIZPgaiugIwv GSG3ihlIJLsc66tfl0Lyxov6qHrnT0EbBSUkHxgUPjdAhVyMmN3O6ot09WNav2rSuPpO WXeA== X-Received: by 10.180.102.230 with SMTP id fr6mr10459515wib.66.1445093097470; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id wz5sm9473774wjc.20.2015.10.17.07.44.55 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:44:56 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <87oafxlfr6.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191834 Archived-At: On 10/17/2015 05:41 PM, David Engster wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: >> (except in C-like languages: skipping over a pair of braces is easy). > > After the pre-processor has run over it, yes... Fair point. But whatever your solution for that is, it's unlikely to help to quickly jump over do ... end blocks in Ruby.